期刊文献+

行政复议制度改革的地方实践和立法建议——基于《行政诉讼法》修改对行政复议制度的影响 被引量:14

Local Practice and Legislative Suggestion of Administrative Reconsideration System Reform: Based on Effect on Administrative Reconsideration System Caused by Amendment of Administrative Procedure Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国行政复议制度长久以来存在诸多问题,新修改《行政诉讼法》的施行对行政复议制度又产生了明显影响,复议体制机制存在的问题和不足亟待改进。山东省遵循行政复议工作规律进行了系列大胆探索,总结了一套相对成熟的改革经验。当前应加快行政复议修法进程,重构行政复议制度体系,将集中复议权改革成果及时固化,确定复议、诉讼并行选择机制,围绕复议决定建构起严格科学的司法审理规则。 There have been many problems in China's administrative reconsideration system for a long time,whilst significant effect on administrative reconsideration is brought by the implementation of the newly revised Administrative Procedure Law.Therefore,problems and deficiencies in related system need to be improved immediately.Following administrative reconsideration rules,a series of exploration has been done by the Shandong government,summarizing a set of relatively mature reform experience.Nowadays,the administrative reconsideration amendment procedure should be speed up,the related system should be reconstructed,the reform result of reconsideration right concentration should be solidified timely,and the system of reconsideration,litigation parallel selection should be defined,as well as strict and scientific judicial review rules of reconsideration decisions should be built up.
作者 朱晓峰
出处 《行政法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期63-74,共12页 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
关键词 行政复议 体制改革 复议诉讼并行 司法审理规则 Administrative Reconsideration System Reform Reconsideration Parallel Proceeding Judicial Review Rule
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献43

  • 1Roscoe Pound,Administrative Law:Its Growth,Procedure and Significance,Littleton,CO:Fred B.Rothman,Co.(1942),p.4.
  • 2Ward v.Brown,22 F.2d 516(2nd Cir.).
  • 3Charles H.Koch, Jr., Administrative Law and Practice (vol. Ⅲ, 2nd Ed.), St.Paul, MN: West Publishing Co. (,1997), pp.3---5.
  • 4United States v. Morgan, 307 U.S. 183.
  • 5Peter L. Strauss, Revisiting Overton Park: Political and Judicial Controls over Adminigrative Actions Affecting Community, 39 UCLA Law Review 1251(1992) .
  • 6Koch, Administrative Law and Practice (vol.Ⅲ), pp.14--15,p. 18,p.15,p.28,p.41.
  • 7Citizen to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 415.
  • 8Medina v. INS, 1 F.2d 312 (5th Cir. ) .
  • 9United States v. First City National Park, 386 U.S. 361.
  • 10Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Lyng, 882 F.2d 1417 (9th Cir. ) .

共引文献62

引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部