摘要
在我国,法不治众的传统法律文化和现代化后发国家的现状,表明"行政+司法"二元制裁体系较之司法一元体系更显合理;同类型行为仅以程度区分一般违法与刑事违法的"交叉立法模式"与以行为类型区分的"分立立法模式"各有利弊,法体系状态和法传统是我们选择前者的原因;罪量因素是"二元交叉制裁体系"的表征,彰显刑法谦抑精神,对其明确性、行为规制机能和管辖冲突等方面的质疑,或是误读,或是各立法模式的通病。
In our country, the dual sanction system （administrative and judicial） is more reasonable than the unified sanction system（only judicial）, because of the traditional legal culture and the reality of national modernization. Both ＂overlapping legislative model＂ and ＂discrete legislative model＂ have their own advantages and disadvantages. We chose the former just because of the law system and legal traditions in our country. The quantitative provisions of crime are the symptoms of ＂the dual overlapping sanction system＂, so doubts about its clarity, function as behavior regulation and jurisdiction conflicts either came from misinterpretation or are common faults of every legislative model.
出处
《江苏社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期170-179,共10页
Jiangsu Social Sciences
基金
江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目(PAPD)资助
关键词
二元制裁体系
交叉立法模式
罪量因素
dual sanction system
overlapping legislative model
the quantitative provisions
