期刊文献+

信息环境变化、投资者信息解读与特质信息含量 被引量:7

Information environment change,investors' comprehension and firm-specific information content
原文传递
导出
摘要 该研究旨在通过考察信息环境变化前后,分析师盈余预测行为和信息质量对投资者决策结果的影响,证明信息环境的变化可能通过改变投资者对信息的解读习惯,影响市场资源配置的效率.研究发现:会计准则变革后,财务分析师盈余预测的准确性下降,预测报告中特质信息含量也发生显著变化,进而使投资者更多关注报告中的行业和市场信息;会计准则变革前,盈余质量与股价同步性正相关,而会计准则变革后,盈余质量与股价同步性的正相关关系减弱或逆转,说明投资者信息处理效率并非一成不变,信息环境能影响投资者对于公司特质信息的发掘、解读和运用.文章指出提升财务分析师、普通投资者等社会公众对上市公司信息披露质量进行识别和监督的能力,对提高市场定价效率,促进资本市场的发展具有重要意义. This paper studies the influence that analysts' forecasting and information quality made on investors' decision making before and after information enviromnent change, to prove that information environment variation may change the efficiency of market allocation of resources by changing investors' information comprehension. First, after the reform of accounting standards, the analysts forecast accuracy decreased, firm-specific information in the forecasting report change significantly, and thus investors pay more attention on the industry-wide and market-wide information. Second, after the reform, the positive correlation of earnings quality and stock price synchronicity weakened or even reversed. The results proved that investors' information processing efficiency is not invariable, but changes with information environment. It is of great significance for financial analysts, ordinary investors and other social public to improve their discrimination and control capability on financial report quality which would improve the efficiency of market pricing and promote the development of capital market.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期2226-2239,共14页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(71372068) 辽宁省教育厅科学研究一般项目(W2014219)~~
关键词 会计准则变革 信息环境 分析师预测 股价同步性 特质信息 accounting standards reform information environment analysts' forecast stock price syn- chronicity firm-specific information
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1Fama E F. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work[J]. Journal of Finance, 1970, 25(5): 383-417.
  • 2Kim J B, Shi H. IFRS reporting, firm-specific information flows, and institutional environments: International evidence[J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2012, 17(3): 474-517.
  • 3Leuz C, Verrecchia R E. The economic consequences of increased disclosure[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2000(38): 91-124.
  • 4Covrig V M, Defond M L, Hung M. Home bias, foreign mutual fund holdings, and the voluntary adoption of international accounting standards[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2007, 45(1): 41 -70.
  • 5Barth M E, Landsman W R, Lang M H, et al. Effects on comparability and capital market benefits of voluntary adoption of IFRS by US firms: Insights from voluntary adoption of IFRS by non-US firms[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013.
  • 6Ashbaugh H, Pincus M. Domestic accounting standards, international accounting standards, and the predictabil-ity of earnings[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2001, 39(3): 417-434.
  • 7Bischof J, Daske H. Fair value accounting and the business model of banks[C]// Accounting Renaissance, 2011.
  • 8Bartov E, Goldberg S R, Kim M. Comparative value relevance among German, US, and international accounting standards: A German stock market perspective[J]. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 2005, 20(2): 95-119.
  • 9Ball R. International financial reporting standards (IFRS): Pros and cons for investors[J]. Accounting and Busi- ness Research, 2006, 36(1): 5-27.
  • 10DeFond M L, et al. Does mandatory IFRS adoption affect crash risk?[J]. Accounting Review, 2015, 90(1): 265-299.

二级参考文献317

共引文献2105

同被引文献146

引证文献7

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部