期刊文献+

异质性消费者、异质性厂商与异质性匹配内生贸易——一个贸易理论的新范式 被引量:2

HETEROGENEOUS CONSUMERS,HETEROGENEOUS FIRMS AND ENDOGENOUS TRADE OF MATCHING HETEROGENEITY:A NEW PARADIGM OF TRADE THEORY
下载PDF
导出
摘要 异质性消费者与异质性厂商的异质性匹配从需求与供给两方面诱致贸易活动产生,基于消费者异质性假定与厂商异质性假定所构建的异质性匹配内生贸易模型,是在新贸易理论与新新贸易理论基础上的综合性拓展和研究新范式引入的逻辑起点。本文的主要贡献在于,在消费者异质性与厂商异质性假定条件下构建国内国际均衡模型,从异质性消费者与异质性厂商的异质性匹配角度对贸易活动进行内生性解释,把产业内贸易与跨国公司内贸易纳入到统一的贸易理论分析框架之中,基于贸易理论新范式对跨国公司产生、产业内贸易与跨国公司内部贸易、企业跨国投资、企业跨国并购与合并、跨国企业贸易联盟的形成进行内生解释,把一个异质性匹配新范式引入贸易理论研究并对当代主流贸易理论进行新拓展。 The heterogeneity match of the heterogeneous consumers and heterogeneous firms is the main cause for trade from supply and demand. The endogenous trade model for heterogeneity match, based on the assumptions of consumers' heterogeneity and firms' heterogeneity, is the new endogenous expansion of the new-new trade theory and the logical starting point of the new paradigm for contemporary mainstream trade theory. The main contributions of this paper are to construct the domestic and international equilibrium models for heterogeneity match based on the consumer's heterogeneity and firms' heterogenei- ty assumptions, to give an endogenous explanation for trade, to bring intra-industry trade and multi-national corporation trade into a unified analysis framework, to give endogenous explanations for causes of multi-national corporation, intra-industry trade, inner trade of multi-national corporation, FDI, enterprise's transnational acquisi- tion and merger, and transnational enterprise trade union based on a new paradigm of trade theory. This paper gives a new expansion for the contemporary mainstream of trade theory.
作者 保建云
出处 《经济理论与经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期84-99,共16页 Economic Theory and Business Management
基金 中国人民大学"统筹推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设"重大规划项目"国际关系与政治学博弈论及大数据方法研究"(16XNLG11)资助
关键词 异质性 异质性匹配内生贸易 贸易理论新范式 heterogeneity endogenous trade of matching heterogeneity new paradigm of trade theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1M. Melitz. The Impact of Trade on Intra-industry Reallocation and Aggregate Industry Productivity [J].Econometri- ca, 2003 (71).
  • 2Pol Antrcis. Firms, Contracts, and Trade Structure [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003, 118 (4).
  • 3E. Bernard, S. Redding. Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms [Z]. NBER Working Paper, 10 668, 2004.
  • 4E. Bernard, C. Redding. Mulit Product Firms and Trade Liberalization [Z]. CES Discussion Paper, 2009.
  • 5J. Constantini, M. Melitz. The Dynamics of Firm Level Adjustment to Trade Liberalization [Z]. Harvard University, Manuscript, 2008.
  • 6M. Melitz, G. Ottaviano. Market Size, Trade, and Productivity [J]. Rev. Econ. Stud. , 2008, 75.
  • 7David T. Frazier, Xiaochun Liu. A New Approach to Risk-return Trade-off Dynamics via Decomposition [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, January 2016, 62.
  • 8Ayse M. Erdogan. Bilateral Trade and the Environment: A General Equilibrium Model Based on New Trade Theory [J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, November 2014, 34.
  • 9Ralf Sabiwalsky. Nonlinear Modelling of Target Leverage with Latent Determinant Variables -- New Evidence on the Trade-off Theory [J]. Review of Financial Economics, October 2010, 19 (4).
  • 10Panayiotis P. Athanasoglou, Ioanna C. Bardaka. New Trade Theory, Non-price Competitiveness and Export Per- formance [J]. Economic Modelling, January 2010, 27 (1).

共引文献40

同被引文献29

引证文献2

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部