摘要
本文采用了课堂观察和文本分析法,对初高中英语课堂上教师纠正反馈语的使用情况及学生回应进行了比较分析。研究结果显示,初、高中教师均采用重铸法纠正学生的语音错误;针对学生的词汇和语法错误,初、高中教师在纠正反馈语的选择上存在显著差异。初高中英语教师在针对不同的语言错误进行明确纠错、重铸和形式协商时会引发学生不同的修正率。基于本文的研究,笔者建议英语教师在使用纠正反馈语时应充分考虑学生的语言水平和错误类型,以达到理想的纠错效果。
The authors use classroom observation and conversation analysis to study how teachers utilize corrective feedback following students' different language errors, and compare the effectiveness of the corrective feedback by studying students' immediate response. The study finds that to correct students' phonetic errors, both junior high school and senior high school English teachers prefer to recast. To correct lexical and grammatical errors, they have different preferences in choosing different types of corrective feedback. Besides, students' responses following different types of corrective feedback are also different. Based on this study, the authors suggest that while using the corrective feedback, teachers should take students' types of errors and language proficiency into consideration to achieve the ideal result.
出处
《基础教育外语教学研究》
2016年第8期16-21,共6页
Foreign Language Teaching & Research in Basic Education
关键词
明确纠错
重铸
形式协商
纠正反馈语
学生回应
explicit correction
recast
negotiation of form
corrective feedback
student's response