期刊文献+

熊彼特竞争,交叉效应与创新激励 被引量:12

Schumpeter competition,cross-effects,and innovation incentives
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论文引入行业熊彼特竞争,基于技术原创性与市场原创性,纳入技术与市场专业人员努力的交叉效应,研究创新激励合约的时间长度、激励实现的组织形式与创新团队剩余索取权分成系数的选择.研究显示:1)当不存在委托代理问题时,技术与市场专业人员的整合总是创新团队组织的优化选择;2)创新团队的组织形式对企业创新对象的复杂性选择与剩余索取权分配不产生影响;3)行业熊彼特竞争强度、创新原创性与创新激励合约时间长度负相关;4)交叉效应与技术和市场原创性3者的关系决定了最优创新激励的组织形式.研究提高了创新团队管理的可操作性,强化了创新激励对行业竞争的响应性. Introducing Schumpeter competition in cal and market professional efforts into our model, industry (SCII) and the crossing effect between technologi- the paper studies the simultaneous optimization of the con- tract duration ( complexity of innovation), organizational form and residual claims in order to motivate innova- tion. The paper finds that integration of technology and market professionals is a prioritized organizational form to motivate teams in the absence of principal-agent problems, and that organizational forms of teams could not exert any impact on either contract duration or residual claims. The study also finds that both the SCII and the originality of innovation are negatively correlated with the contract duration, and that the organizational form ofteams is dependent on the relationship among the crossing effect, technological originality, and market origi- nality. This study improves the actual operability with reference to innovation incentives and strengthens the response to industrial competition.
作者 蒋军锋 王茜
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期79-93,共15页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172200 71672143 71402137) 教育部人文社会科学一般资助项目(16YJA630020) 陕西省软科学研究计划资助项目(2016KRM033) 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划资助项目(2015JM7375) 陕西省重点学科建设专项资金资助项目(107-00X901) 西安理工大学青年社会科学学术创新团队资助项目(105-451215007)
关键词 技术-市场原创性 交叉效应 创新复杂性 激励刚性 激励扭曲 technology & market originality crossing effects complexity of innovation incentive rigidity incentive distortion
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1O' Connor G C, Rice M P. A comprehensive model of uncertainty associated with radical innovation[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 30( S1 ) : 2 - 18.
  • 2Oehmen J, Olechowski A, Kenley C R, et al. Analysis of the effect of risk management practices on the performance of new product development programs [J]. Technovation, 2014, 34 (8) : 441 - 453.
  • 3Slater S F, Mohr J J, Sengupta S. Radical product innovation capability: Literature review, synthesis, and illustrative re- search propositions [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31 (3) : 552 - 566.
  • 4Wu D D, Kefan X, Hua L, et al. Modeling technological innovation risks of an entrepreneurial team using system dynamics : An agent-based perspective[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2010, 77 (6) : 857 -869.
  • 5Bloom N, Sehankerman M, Van Reenen J. Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry [J]. Econometriea, 2013, 81(4) : 1347 - 1393.
  • 6Candi M, van den Ende J, Gemser G. Organizing innovation projects under technological turbulence [J]. Technovation, 2013, 33(4) : 133 - 141.
  • 7Dibb S. Managing risks or stifling innovation? Risk, hazard and uncertainty [J]. International Journal of Agricultural Man- agement, 2013, 2(3) : 125 - 129.
  • 8Carson S J, Wu T, Moore W L. Managing the trade-off between ambiguity and volatility in new product development [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2012, 29(6) : 1061 -1081.
  • 9Parent J D, Sullivan C C, Hardway C, et al. A model and test of individual and organization factors influencing individual adaptation to change[J]. Organization Management Journal, 2012, 9(4) : 216 -235.
  • 10Legros P, Newman A F. A price theory of vertical and lateral integration [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2013, 128(2) : 725 -770.

二级参考文献19

  • 1Arrow K. Optimal insurance and generalized deductibles[J]. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1973: 1-42.
  • 2Asheim G, Emblem A, Nilssen T. Deductibles in health insurance: Pay or pain?[J]. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 2003, 3(4): 253-266.
  • 3Smith M, Head G. Guidelines for insurers in pricing deductibles[J]. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 1978, 45(2): 217-238.
  • 4Smith V. Essays in the theory of risk-bearing[J]. The Journal of Business, 1974, 47(1): 96-98.
  • 5Raviv A. The design of an optimal insurance policy[J]. The American Economic Review, 1979, 69(1): 84-96.
  • 6Zhou C Y, Wu C F. Optimal insurance under the insurer's risk constraint[J]. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2008, 42(3): 992-999.
  • 7Collier C. Optimal insurance design: What can we do with and without expected utility?[J]. Handbook of Insurance, 2001, 1(1): 97- 116.
  • 8Cohen A. Asymmetric information and learning: Evidence from the automobile insurance market[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2005, 87(2): 197-207.
  • 9Bardey D, Lesur R. Optima heath insurance contract: Is a deductible useful?[J]. Economics Letters, 2005, 87(3): 313-317.
  • 10Zimmermann H. An application-oriented view of modeling uncertaintyIJ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 122(2): 190 -198.

共引文献1

同被引文献188

引证文献12

二级引证文献159

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部