期刊文献+

中国评级市场被“劣币驱逐良币”机制主导了吗 被引量:5

Has‘Survival of the Fittest' Mechanism Dominated the Rating Market in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 声誉机制能够产生"优胜劣汰"的压力,是对评级机构行为的重要约束。中国舍本逐末的评级制度安排和不成熟的市场环境不仅阻碍了声誉机制的形成,还为评级机构出具过高评级提供了空间。根据该情况构建的评级合谋市场均衡模型,证明了我国评级市场竞争增加会导致评级质量的下降。利用鹏元资信评估有限公司进入城投企业债评级市场作为自然实验的进一步研究对理论进行了验证。分析表明,"劣币驱逐良币"的恶性竞争机制在我国评级市场占据主导地位。为此,我国在长期内应当对评级行业的制度安排进行重新设计,建立以声誉机制为主导的市场环境;短期内则需要加强监管,同时控制评级市场的竞争程度。 The reputation mechanism which can generate the pressure of ' Survival of the Fittest', is an important restriction to behavior of credit rating agencies. It is China' s credit rating system which sacrifices the substance for the shadow and immature rating market, which not only hindered the formation of reputation mechanism but also provided space for CRAs to offer higher ratings. Based on above, this paper built up a model of equilibrium in rating conspiring market and proved that the market competition in credit rating market of China would lower the quality of credit ratings. And by taking Peng Yuan's entry into the credit rating market of quasi - municipal bond as a natural experiment, we found empirical evidences. Analysis shows that the vicious competition mechanism of ' bad money drives out good money' has dominated the credit rating industry. For suggestions, the Chinese government should reshape the restriction mechanisms for CRAs and built up a rating market dominated with reputation mechanism in the long run. As in short run, the government needs to enhance supervision and make a control on the market competition.
机构地区 中央财经大学
出处 《贵州财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期29-40,共12页 Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
基金 财政部横向研究课题"财税改革和城镇化进程中我国地方政府融资机制设计"
关键词 市场竞争 信用评级 声誉机制 评级质量 market competition credit rating reputation mechanism quality of credit ratings
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Chemmanur T J, Paolo F. Investment Bank Reputation, Information Production, and Financial Intermediation [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 1994,49( 1 ) :57 - 79.
  • 2Jiang J. Beating Earnings Benchmarks and the Cost of Debt [ J ]. Accounting Review,2006,83 (2) :2089 - 2136.
  • 3Strier F. Rating the Raters: Conflicts of Interest in the Credit Rating Firms [ J]. Business & Society Review,2008,113 (4) :533 -553.
  • 4Titman S,Trueman B. Information Quality and the Valuation of New Issues [J]. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 1986,8(2) : 159 - 172.
  • 5Kennedy S. China~ Emerging Credit Rating Industry:The Official Foundations of Private Authority [ J]. China Quarterly, 2008,193 ( 193 ) :65 - 83.
  • 6马榕,石晓军.中国债券信用评级结果具有甄别能力吗?——基于盈余管理敏感性的视角[J].经济学(季刊),2015,14(4):197-216. 被引量:86
  • 7寇宗来,盘宇章,刘学悦.中国的信用评级真的影响发债成本吗?[J].金融研究,2015(10):81-98. 被引量:153
  • 8Klein B, Leffler K B. The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance [ J]. Journal of Political Economy,1981,89(4) :615 -41.
  • 9Shapiro C. Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations [ J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983,98 (4) :659 -79.
  • 10Doherty N A, Kartasheva A V, Phillips R D. Information Effect of Entry Into Credit Ratings Market :The Case of Insurers "Ratings [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2012,106 (2) : 308 - 330.

二级参考文献81

  • 1李琦,罗炜,谷仕平.企业信用评级与盈余管理[J].经济研究,2011,46(S2):88-99. 被引量:75
  • 2朱世武,邢丽.中国债券市场新债定价研究[J].财经研究,2005,31(4):46-55. 被引量:5
  • 3李丽.公司债券市场的强制担保要求和投资者定位[J].金融研究,2006(3):67-75. 被引量:18
  • 4张力美.美国市政债券发行研究[J].统计与决策,2006,22(21):127-129. 被引量:3
  • 5Antle, R. 1984. Auditor Independence. Journal of Accounting Research, 22 (1) : 1 - 20.
  • 6Baiman, S. , J. H. Evans III, and N. J. Nagarajan. 1991. Collusion in Auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 29 (1) : 1 -18.
  • 7Bologua, G. J. , R. J. Lindquist, and J. T. Wells. 1993. The Accountant' s Handbook of Fraud and Commercial Crime. New York, NY : John Wiley & Sons Inc, 20 - 81.
  • 8Kofman, F. and J. Lawarree. 1993. Collusion in Hierarchical Agency. Econometrica, 61 (3):629-656.
  • 9Laffont, J. 1990. Analysis of Hidden Gaming in a Three - Level Hierarchy. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6 (2) : 301 -324.
  • 10Laffont, J. , A. Faure -Grimaud, and D. Martimort. 2001. Collusion, Delegation and Supervision with Soft Information. Work- ing Paper IDEI, Toulouse.

共引文献249

同被引文献36

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部