非水平行业中企业创新行为分析被引量：1

Analysis of Innovation Behavior of Corporations in Unleveled Sectors

下载PDF

导出

摘要通过双寡头企业的竞争与收益分析得到企业的支付函数,对非水平行业中企业的创新选择进行博弈分析。由博弈均衡分析竞争对企业创新的影响,在Aghion的逐步创新与自动追赶假设下,只有在市场竞争激烈或缺乏竞争的极端条件下,领先者才会不创新;在市场竞争程度适中的条件下,领先者将随机选择是否创新。非水平行业中,企业创新受创新成本、学习效应、产出能力和串谋程度的影响,竞争抑制非水平行业中企业的创新,即存在明显的熊彼特效应。 The double-oligarchs ' competition and profits are analyzed in the unleveled sectors to get the payoff function. Their choices of the innovation are discussed by applying game theory. Then the effects of the competition to the innovation in the unleveled sectors are studied.It is found that under the assumption of gradual innovation and automated pursuit of Aghion,leader only in extreme conditions in the fierce market competition or lack of competition will not choose to innovate. Under the conditions of moderate degree of market competition,leaders will randomly choose whether be innovative or not. In the unleveled sectors of industry,enterprise innovation is influenced by the cost of innovation, learning effect and output capacity or collusion degree. Competition inhibits innovation in unleveled sectors of industry,namely,the existence of obvious Schumpeterian effect.

作者刘慧宏

机构地区宁波大学

出处《阅江学刊》 2016年第4期63-69,147,共7页 Yuejiang Academic Journal

基金国家自然科学基金项目"中国传统制造产业集群转型与转移融合发展模式与实现路径研究"(71503143)

关键词非水平行业企业创新市场竞争创新成本熊彼特效应 unleveled sectors enterprise innovation market competition innovation cost Schumpeterian effect

分类号 F273.1 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献7

1Schumpeter J, The Theory of Economic Development, Boston : Harvard University Press, 1934, pp. 159-192.
2Arrow K J, Economic Welfare and the Allocation Resources for Inventions, Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1962, pp. 609-625.
3Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundellr, et al, "Competition and Innovation : An Inverted-U Relationship," Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.120, no.2(2005.05), pp.701-728.
4Philippe A, Christophe C, Delphine I, "Competition, R&D, and the Cost of Innovation : Evidence for France, " Oxford Economic Papers, vol.65, no. 2(2013), pp. 293-311.
5Aamir R H, "Competition and Innovation: the Inverted-U Relationship Revisited," The Review of Economics and Statis- tics, vol. 95, no. 5 (2013.11) , pp. 1653-1668.
6王必好,黄浩杰.寡头垄断市场结构的技术创新效应研究——基于伯特兰和古诺均衡分析视角[J].经济评论,2013(5):13-21. 被引量：10
7[美]朱·弗登博格、[法]让·梯若尔,2002:《博弈论》,黄涛等译,北京:中国人民大学出版社.

二级参考文献16

1周立,吴玉鸣.中国区域创新能力:因素分析与聚类研究——兼论区域创新能力综合评价的因素分析替代方法[J].中国软科学,2006(8):96-103. 被引量：120
2胥莉,陈宏民.具有网络外部性特征的企业定价策略研究[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(6):23-30. 被引量：60
3Aghion,P. ,C. Harris, and J. Vickers. 1997. " Competition and Growth with Step- by- step Innovation: An Example. " European Economic Review ,41 ( 3 ) : 772 - 780.
4Aghion, P. , and P. Howitt. 1992. "A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction. " Econometrica ,60 (2) :343 - 346.
5Arrow, K. J. 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation Resources for Inventions. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
6Cheng, Leonard. 1985. " Comparing Bertrand and Cournot Equilibrium: A Geometric Approach. " Rand Journal of Economics, 47(16) :146 - 147.
7Gan,Deqiang, and Donald, V. Bourcier. 2002. "Locational Market Power Screening and Congestion Management: Experience and Suggestions. " IEEE on Trans on Power System,17 (1) :180 -185.
8Grossman, G. M. , and E. Helpman. 1991. "Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth. " Review of Economic Studies, 58 ( 1 ) : 49 - 52.
9Pindyck, R. S. , and D. L. Rubinfeld. 1997. Microeconomics. 3rd ed. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press.
10Rajal, K. D. , A. R. Emmanuel, G. Macatangay, and D. Sidart. 2002. "An Analysis of Generation Market Power in the Midwest Interconnect. " The Electricity Journal,15 (3):29 - 39.