期刊文献+

开腹胆囊手术与腹腔镜胆囊手术术后肠粘连发生率的比较 被引量:9

Comparison of the incidences of postoperative intestinal adhesion between open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较开腹胆囊手术与腹腔镜胆囊手术术后肠粘连的发生率。方法选取2012—11-2014—11在该院接受治疗的110例胆囊结石患者作为研究对象,根据患者入院时间将其编号,按照随机数字表分为对照组和研究组各55例,对照组行开腹胆囊手术,研究组行腹腔镜胆囊手术。术后观察并随诊一年。观察记录两组患者术后肠粘连的发生情况。结果对照组手术时间、术中出血量、术后的胃肠功能恢复时间以及住院时间等均明显高于研究组(P〈0.05)。对照组进行开腹胆囊手术术后肠黏连的发生率为61.82%,研究组行腹腔镜胆囊手术术后肠黏连的发生率为7.27%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=38.4368,P〈0.05)。结论腹腔镜胆囊手术具有疗效好、并发症发生率低等优点,且安全性较高,值得在临床上推广使用。 Objective To observe the incidences of postoperative intestinal adhesion in open cholecystecto- my and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods One hundred and ten patients with gallstones were collected as the research subjects from November 2012 to November 2014 and were divided into two groups according to the random number table. Group A( n = 55 ) was treated with open cholecystectomy, and group B (n = 55 ) was treated with lapa- roscopic cholecystectomy. All cases were followed up for one year. The incidences of postoperative adhesion was com- pared between the two groups. Results The operating time, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time and time in group A were significantly longer than those in group B( P 〈 0. 05 ). The blood loss of group A was significant- ly more than that of group B(P 〈0. 05). The incidence of postoperative intestinal adhesion of group A(61.82% ) was significantly higher than that of group B (7.27 % ) (χ2 = 38. 4368, P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery has better effects and less complications than open cholecystectomy in the treatment of gallstone.
作者 连福珍
出处 《中国临床新医学》 2016年第9期804-806,共3页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
关键词 开腹胆囊手术 腹腔镜胆囊手术 术后肠粘连 Open cholecystectomy Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Postoperative intestinal adhesion
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献37

  • 1苏域,胡少华.腹腔镜胆囊切除术并发症的防治体会[J].中国医药,2006,1(8):483-484. 被引量:10
  • 2陈彦波,吴唯.腹腔镜胆囊大部分切除术临床应用探讨[J].中国普通外科杂志,2007,16(2):195-196. 被引量:26
  • 3黄建彪,郑小锋.腹腔镜胆囊大部切除术在困难胆囊切除中的临床应用[J].中国内镜杂志,2007,13(6):643-645. 被引量:5
  • 4吴在德.外科学[M]第6版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.407.
  • 5Oyogoa SO, Komenaka 1K, Ilkhani R, et al. Mini-laparotomy cholecys- tectomy in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a community- based hospital perspective[ J]. Am Surg,2003,69 (7) :604 - 607.
  • 6Pavlidis TE. Laparoscopic choleeysteetomy for gangrenous cholecystitis in the elderly[ J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2006,16 ( 1 ) : 79 - 8O.
  • 7Livingston EH, Rege RV. Anationwide study of conversion from lapa- roscopic to open cholecystectomy [ J ]. Am J Surg, 2004, 188 ( 3 ) : 205 -211.
  • 8Brodsky A, Matter I, Sabo E, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis : can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2000, 14(8) : 755 -760.
  • 9Ding KF, Chen R, Zhang JL, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer: results of a Chinese three-cen- ter case-control study [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2009,23 ( 4 ) : 854 -861.
  • 10Liang X, Hou S, Liu H, et al. Effectiveness and safety of laparo- scopic resection versus Open surgery in patients with rectal canc- er: a randomized, controlled trial from China [ J ]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ,2011,21 (5) :381-385.

共引文献23

同被引文献61

引证文献9

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部