期刊文献+

影响群体道歉有效性的因素 被引量:2

Factors affecting the effectiveness of inter-group apology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 影响群体道歉有效性的因素是多方面的。对侵犯群体而言,有效的群体道歉需要在言语表达中包含承认错误、承担责任、表达懊悔、做出承诺等内容,需要讲究群体道歉的行为策略,同时还应该关注道歉的内部动机对语言表达与行为方式的影响。对受害群体来讲,侵犯群体道歉的有效性在于道歉本身缓解了其愤怒情绪,满足了其自尊和期望等心理需求,同时还要受到他们对道歉真诚性知觉程度的影响。除此之外,群体道歉还会受到群际关系质量、冲突程度、文化信念等外部因素的影响。在今后的研究中,应该继续尝试整合群体道歉的过程机制,丰富群体道歉有效性的考察指标,发挥道歉在社会生活领域中的积极作用。 Factors affecting the effectiveness of inter-group apology are manifold. For perpetrator groups, an effective inter-group apology needs to include admitting mistakes, taking responsibility, expressing regret, making commitments, etc. in verbal expressions. Simultaneously, perpetrator groups should consider behavior strategies of the inter-group apology, as well as the impact from the internal motivation behind the apology on their verbal expressions and behaviors. For victim groups, the effectiveness of the perpetrator- group's apology lies in the fact that the apology itself eases the fury, meets the victim group's psychological needs for self-esteem and expectations, and meanwhile is subject to the moderation of perceptual degree of sincere apology. Additionally, an inter-group apology will also be affected by the quality of inter-group relations, the degree of conflict, cultural beliefs, and other external factors. In future studies, it should be attempted to integrate the process mechanisms of group apology, to enrich the inspection indexes of the effectiveness of group apology, and to allow apologies to play an active role in the area of social life.
作者 艾娟 AI Juan(Department of Psychology, Tian Jin University of Commerce, TianJin 300134, China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期1478-1484,共7页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目:间接群际接触改善群体态度研究(15CSH014)的阶段性成果
关键词 道歉 群体道歉 群体伤害 群际关系 apology inter-group apology group damage inter-group relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1石伟,闫现洋,刘杰.对不公正历史事件的情绪反应——群体内疚[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(2):224-232. 被引量:11
  • 2诸彦含,范黎娟.关系补救:类型、潜在机制与作用模型[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(3):512-521. 被引量:8
  • 3Andrieu, K. (2009). 'sorry for the genocide': How public apologies can help promote national reconciliation. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 38, 3-23.
  • 4Arthur, S. A. (2010). Using apology to promote intergroup forgiveness: Appealing to group identity (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Purdue University.
  • 5Azar, F., Mullet, E., & Vinsotmeau, G. (1999). The propensity to forgive: Findings from Lebanon. Journal of Peace Research, 36(2), 169-181.
  • 6Berndsen, M., Hornsey, M. J., & Wohl, M. J. A. (2015). The impact of a victim-focused apology on forgiveness in an intergroup context. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(5), 726-739.
  • 7Blatz, C. W., Day, M. V., & Schryer, E. (2014). Official public apology effects on victim group members' evaluations of the perpetrator group. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 46(3), 337-345.
  • 8Blatz, C. W., & Philpot, C. (2010). On the outcomes of intergroup apologies: A review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 995-1007.
  • 9Blatz, C. W., Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2009). Government apologies for historical injustices. Political Psychology, 30(2), 219-241.
  • 10Bombay, A., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2013). Expectations among aboriginal peoples in Canada regarding the potential impacts of a government apology. Political Psychology, 34(3), 443-460.

二级参考文献74

  • 1Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994).Guilt: An .interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243-267.
  • 2Berndsen, M, & McGarty, C. (2010).The impact of magnitude of harm and perceived difficulty of making reparations on group-based guilt and reparation towards victims of historical harm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 500-513.
  • 3Bransnmbe, N. R., & Miron, A. M. (2004). Interpreting the ingroup's negative actions toward another group: Emotional reactions to appraised harm. In L.Z. Tiedens & C. W. Leach (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 314-335). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 4Brown, R., & Cehajic, S. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669-684.
  • 5Brown, R., Gonzalez, R., Zagefka, H., Manzi, J., & Cehajic, S. (2008). Nuestra Culpa: Collective guilt as a predictor for reparation for historical wrong-doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 75-90.
  • 6Doosje, B. & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Attributions for the negative historical actions of a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 235-248.
  • 7Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-876.
  • 8Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S R. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt: The effect of ingroup identification. Group processes and intergroup relations, 9, 325-338.
  • 9Ferguson, M. A. (2008). Collective guilt for harming future ingroup members: the case of American identity and global warning. Unpublished doctorial dissertation. University of Kansas, Kansas, USA.
  • 10Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708-724.

共引文献16

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部