期刊文献+

论仲裁裁决司法监督 被引量:1

Research on the Judicial Supervision System of Arbitration Decision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 仲裁作为一种重要的非诉讼纠纷解决机制,在纷繁复杂的民商事纠纷中扮演着重要的角色。既然有权力的行使,必然需要监督的存在。撤销和不予执行仲裁裁决作为仲裁司法监督的重要方式,对保障仲裁的公正、当事人的合法权益发挥了不可磨灭的作用。然而,这两种监督方式在监督范围和监督体制方面都存在一定的问题,因此,适当的限定监督范围,整合监督方式,统一监督标准对于我国仲裁裁决司法监督制度的完善具有一定的现实意义。 Arbitration, which is an important non -litigation settlement mechanism, plays much more value roles in civil and commercial disputes. Rights and supervision must exist side by side. As the main parts in the judicial supervision system of arbitration decision, revocation and non - enforcement can guarantee the rights of the justice of arbitration and litigant. However, these two kinds of methods have some drawbacks in terms of supervision scope and system. So the ways of limiting supervision scope properly, integrating supervision methods as well as unifying supervision standards provide practical significance in perfecting China' s judicial supervision system of arbitration decision.
作者 哈书菊 张淇
出处 《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2016年第9期70-72,共3页 Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
基金 2012年黑龙江省哲学社会科学规划项目:发回重审制度调研报告(12B076) 黑龙江大学2016年研究生创新科研项目:论仲裁案外人的权利保障(YJSCX2016-053HLJU)
关键词 仲裁裁决 撤销 不予执行 司法监督 arbitration award withdrawal refusal of enforcement judicial supervision
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献44

  • 1肖永平.内国、涉外仲裁监督机制之我见——对《中国涉外仲裁监督机制评析》一文的商榷[J].中国社会科学,1998(2):94-97. 被引量:29
  • 2肖永平.也谈我国法院对仲裁的监督范围——与陈安先生商榷[J].法学评论,1998,16(1):42-49. 被引量:57
  • 3陈安.中国涉外仲裁监督机制评析[J].中国社会科学,1995(4):19-30. 被引量:64
  • 4P. Sanders, Quo Vadis Arbitration? - Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice - A Comparative Study, Kluwer Law International, 1999, p. 34.
  • 5Articles 34 and 36 of the 1985 UNCITRAL Model Law.
  • 6P Sanders, Quo Vadis Arbitration? - Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice- A Comparative Study, Kluwer Law International, 1999, p. 33.
  • 7P. Sanders, Quo Vadis Arbitration? - Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice - A Comparative Study, Kluwer Law International, 1999, p. 28.
  • 8L. Goldman, Contractually Expanded Review of Arbitration Awards, 8 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 171 (Spring 2003).
  • 9W H Knull, III and N. D. Rubins, Betting the Farm on International Arbitration: Is it Time to Offer an Appeal Option? 11 The American Review of International Arbitration 531 (2000).
  • 10T J Klitgaard, The Transnational Arbitration of High-Tech Disputes, presentation given to the 7th Annual Transnational Commercial Arbitration of Workshop, Dallas, Texas, June 20 1996. Available at http://www, wirepaladln, com/articles/article9, htm.

共引文献39

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部