期刊文献+

Saturation Ion Current Densities in Inductively Coupled Hydrogen Plasma Produced by Large-Power Radio Frequency Generator

Saturation Ion Current Densities in Inductively Coupled Hydrogen Plasma Produced by Large-Power Radio Frequency Generator
下载PDF
导出
摘要 An experimental investigation of the saturation ion current densities (Jions) in hydrogen inductively coupled plasma (ICP) produced by a large-power (2-32 kW) radio frequency (RF) generator is reported, then some reasonable explanations are given out. With the increase of RF power, the experimental results show three stages: in the first stage (2-14 kW), the electron temperature will rise with the increase of RF power in the ICP, thus, the Jions increases continually as the electron temperature rises in the ICP. In the second stage (14 20 kW), as some H- ions lead to the mutual neutralization (MN), the slope of Jio^s variation firstly decreases then increases. In the third stage (20-32 kW), both the electronic detachment (ED) and the associative detachment (AD) in the ICP result in the destruction of H- ions, therefore, the increased amplitude of the Jions in the third stage is weaker than the one in the first stage. In addition, with the equivalent transformer model, we successfully Explain that the Jions at different radial locations in ICP has the same rule. Finally, it is found that the Jions has nothing to do with the outer/inner puffing gas pressure ratio, which is attributed to the high-speed movement of hydrogen molecules. An experimental investigation of the saturation ion current densities (Jions) in hydrogen inductively coupled plasma (ICP) produced by a large-power (2-32 kW) radio frequency (RF) generator is reported, then some reasonable explanations are given out. With the increase of RF power, the experimental results show three stages: in the first stage (2-14 kW), the electron temperature will rise with the increase of RF power in the ICP, thus, the Jions increases continually as the electron temperature rises in the ICP. In the second stage (14 20 kW), as some H- ions lead to the mutual neutralization (MN), the slope of Jio^s variation firstly decreases then increases. In the third stage (20-32 kW), both the electronic detachment (ED) and the associative detachment (AD) in the ICP result in the destruction of H- ions, therefore, the increased amplitude of the Jions in the third stage is weaker than the one in the first stage. In addition, with the equivalent transformer model, we successfully Explain that the Jions at different radial locations in ICP has the same rule. Finally, it is found that the Jions has nothing to do with the outer/inner puffing gas pressure ratio, which is attributed to the high-speed movement of hydrogen molecules.
作者 王松柏 雷光玖 毕振华 H.GHOMI 杨思泽 刘东平 WANG Songbai LEI Guangjiu BI Zhenhua H. GHOMI YANG Size LIU Dongping(College of Physics and Information Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu 610041, China School of Physics and Materials Engineering, Dalian Nationalities University, Dalian 116600, China 4Laser and Plasma Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Evin, Tehrar, Iran 5School of Physics and Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)
出处 《Plasma Science and Technology》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2016年第9期907-911,共5页 等离子体科学和技术(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Science Program of China(Nos.2011GB108011 and 2010GB103001) the Major International(Regional)Project Cooperation and Exchanges of China(No.11320101005) the Startup Fund from Fuzhou University(No.510071)
关键词 saturation ion current densities large-power RF generator outer/innerpuffing gas pressure ratio H- ion transformer model saturation ion current densities, large-power RF generator, outer/innerpuffing gas pressure ratio, H- ion, transformer model
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1~jisawa N, Inoue T, Di Pietro E, et al. 2000, Neutral Beam Heating and Current Drive System and Its Role in ITER-FEAT Operation Scenarios. Proc. 18thFusion Energy Conf., International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA-CN-77.
  • 2Fantz U and Wiinderlich D. 2006, New Journal of Physics, 8:301.
  • 3Franzen P, Wiinderlich D, Fantz U, et al. 2014, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 56:025007.
  • 4Fantz U, Franzen P, Kraus W, et al. 2008, Review of Scientific Instrument, 79:02A511.
  • 5Wang Songbai, Lei Guangjiu, Liu Dongping, et al. 2014, Plasma Science and Technology, 16:219.
  • 6Schott L. 1968, Plasma Diagnostics. ed. W. Lochte- Holtgreven, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.
  • 7Chert F F. 1984, Introduction to Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. Vol.1, 2nd ed., Plenum Press, New York.
  • 8Lim Ai Nuan. 2010, Characterization of an Inductively Coupled Plasma Produced in Argon at 13.56 MHz. Master of Science, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
  • 9Lieberman M A and Lichtenberg A J. 2005, Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing. John Wiley &: Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
  • 10Ogasawara M. 1991, Ion based NBI. Proe. IAEA TCM Neg. Ibaraki-ken, Japan, p.99.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部