期刊文献+

利用人体生物标本进行研究的伦理思考——美国受试者保护“通用法则”的修改建议及启示 被引量:11

Ethical Consideration on the Researches Using Human Biological Specimen-Revision Suggestion and Enlightenment of "Common Rule" for Subject Protection in the United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人体生物标本的利用对推动生物医学的进展有重大意义,与此同时,强大的电子数据库信息处理能力给个人信息的保密带来了挑战。对于利用人体生物标本的研究,如何在确保遵循伦理原则的基础上促进研究的顺利开展,是美国卫生与人类服务部在修改美国联邦法规——人体研究受试者保护"通用法则"过程中的重要考虑因素之一。其公布的"建议规则制定通知"提出:通过泛知情同意,强化对受试者自主权的尊重,几乎不再有免除知情同意的情况;对于研究风险仅仅涉及隐私保护,将在明确保证执行隐私法等保护措施的前提下,简化审查程序。围绕NPRM中提出的有关利用人体生物标本的研究的修改情况进行介绍,对NPRM中关于知情同意、豁免审查和排除审查的相关条款进行整理分析,在此基础上探讨对我国伦理审查工作的启发和借鉴。 The use of human biological specimen has great significance to the development of biomedicine. Meanwhile, the powerful electronic data set with sophisticated analytic techniques creates challenge to the protec-tion of private information. As for the research with human biological specimen, how to facilitate the research con-duct on the basis of ethical principles is one of the key considerations when the US Department of Health and Hu-man Service initiated the revision of Code of Federal Regulations ( CFR) -the"Common Rule" for subject protec-tion. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ( NPRM) proposed:Respect for autonomy will be enforced by broad con-sent to enforce and waiver of consent intend to be rare;If the research risks only involve privacy protection, review process will be simplified under the premise of ensuring the implementation of privacy laws and other protective measures. The paper introduced the revisions related to the researches using human biological specimen in NPRM, analyzed the terms of broad consent, exemption and exclusion, and explored the elicitation to ethical review prac-tice in China.
出处 《中国医学伦理学》 2016年第5期849-851,共3页 Chinese Medical Ethics
关键词 人体生物标本研究 泛知情同意 豁免审查 排除审查 Research on Human Biological Specimen Broad Consent Exemption Review Exclusion Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Department of Health and Human Service ( the U-nited States) . Subpart A of 45 CFR part 46 [ EB/OL]. (2009 - 07 -14) [2016 -06 -25]. http://www. hhs. gov/ ohrp/humansubjects/ guidance/45cfr46. html.
  • 2Cynthia McGuire Dunn, Gary L. Chadwick. Pro-tecting Study Volunteers in Research, a manual forinvestigator sites [ Z ] . the United Sates,ThomsonCenterwatch, 2004.
  • 3Department of Health and Human Service (the U-nited States),A Notice of Public Rulemaking[EB/OL]. (2015 -09 -08) [2016 -05 -08].https://www. gpo. gov/fdsys/pkg/FR - 2015 - 09-08/pdf/2015 -21756. pdf.
  • 4上海重大疾病临床生物样本库伦理管理指南[J].医学与哲学(A),2014,35(3):84-86. 被引量:19

二级参考文献10

  • 1World Health ()rganization, International Agency {or Research Cancer.Common Minimum Technical Standards and Protocol for Biological Resource Centers Dedicated to Cancer Research,2007.
  • 2United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, 2003.
  • 3Organization Economic Co operation and Development. Guidelines for Human Biobanks and Genetic Research Databases,2009.
  • 4Office of Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U. S, Department of Health and Human Services. National Cancer Institute Best Practices {or Biospecimen Resources, 2011.
  • 5Australasian Biospecimen Network. Biospecimen Protocols, 2007.
  • 6German Ethics Council. Human Biobanks for Research:Opinion,2010.
  • 7International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories. 2012 Best Practices for Repositories,2012.
  • 8世界医学会.赫尔辛基宣言,2008.
  • 9卫生部.涉及人的生物医学研究伦理审查办法,2007.
  • 10国家食品药品监督管理局.伦理委员会药物临床试验伦理审查工作指导原则,2010.

共引文献18

同被引文献53

引证文献11

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部