摘要
殷墟甲骨文中有“ ”、“ ”两字,旧有对此二字的认识存在颇多分歧,甚或误混为一字。本文将其明确分为两字,并辨析其字形异同,澄清一些错误认识。“ ”字从“豕”声,卜辞皆用为贞人名(或作“豕”);“ ”字从“ (豭)”声,卜辞用为动词,应读为“泝/溯”,甚至可能就是“泝/溯”的古字。
To " " and " ", two characters in the oracle-bone inscriptions unearthed from Yin ruins, there were a lot of different interpretations, and they even were mixed up as one character. In this dissertation,we divided them into two characters definitely, discriminated the similarities and differences of their graphemes, and clarified some wrong misconceptions. It is considered that character " " took " " as the phonetic component, and was used as a diviner's name; character " " took " (豭)" as the phonetic component, and was used as verb "泝/溯". We even can say that " " was the ancient form of "泝/溯".
出处
《中国文字研究》
CSSCI
2016年第1期16-22,共7页
The Study of Chinese Characters
基金
上海市2010年度哲学社科规划课题项目“殷墟非王卜辞的文本整理与字词研究”
2011年度国家社科基金青年项目“殷墟子卜辞的文本整理与字词研究”(项目号:11CYY049)阶段性成果之一
关键词
甲骨文
花东卜辞
古文字考释
泝/溯
inscriptions on bones or tortoise shells
oracle-bone inscriptions unearthed from Locus East of Huayuanzhuang
textual research and interpretation of ancient writing
泝/溯