期刊文献+

基于关联数据的科研机构评价指标权重计算方法研究 被引量:9

Research on Weigh Computing Method of Evaluation Indicators of Scientific Research Institution Based on LOD
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的 /意义]科研评价中指标权重计算的合理性将直接影响科研机构评价结果的客观性和准确性,本文提出利用信息论方法来计算指标权重,为指标权重计算提供一种新的思路。[方法 /过程]基于DBpedia数据集,利用信息论方法计算出的指标权重和上海交通大学世界大学排行榜已有的指标权重,同时对榜单前100名大学机构进行排名,并将排名结果进行对比分析。[结果 /结论]实验发现利用本文提出的权重计算方法得出的机构得分结果与上海交通大学已有指标权重的得分结果皮尔逊相关性为0.980,斯皮尔曼相关性为0.939,并且其排名顺序和上海交通大学给出的排名顺序皮尔逊相关性和斯皮尔曼相关性均为0.939。以上两个排名结果的得分相关性和排名相关性极强,证明本研究中关联数据的权重计算方法的有效性。 [Purpose/significance] The rationality of calculating the indicators weight in the scientific research evaluation directly affects the accuracy and objectivity of evaluation results of scientific research institution. This paper proposes a new method for computing the indicators weight by the information theory.[Method/process] Based on the DBpedia set and information theory, it computes the indicator weight and uses the existing indicator weight of Shanghai Jiaotong University's World University Rankings, makes a ranking experiment on the list of top 100 universities and makes a comparative analysis on the two kinds of ranking results.[Result/conclusion] The Pearson correlation between the score results with the proposed weight computing method and of Shanghai Jiaotong University's existing weights is 0.980, Spearman correlation is 0.939. The Pearson correlation and Spearman correlation between its ranking order and Shanghai Jiaotong University's are both 0.939. The score correlation and rank correlation of above two ranking results are very strong, and prove the validity of the weight computing method based on the linked data in this study.
作者 蒋世银
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第16期110-115,共6页 Library and Information Service
关键词 关联数据 评价指标 科研评价 权重计算 linked data evaluation indicator scientific research evaluation weigh computing
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献58

共引文献744

同被引文献201

引证文献9

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部