期刊文献+

融合加权动态权威度和兴趣度的专家推荐方法 被引量:3

Weighted Dynamic Degree of Authority and Degree of Interest for Expert Recommendation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 问答系统是目前热门的知识库构建方式之一.然而,当前的问答系统普遍采用专家自主回答或分类随机推荐方式,问题回答的准确率、及时性均较低,导致知识库中噪音知识泛滥.针对以上现象,提出一种基于加权动态权威度的专家推荐方法.该方法首先通过分析专家历史回答内容,并将专家加权动态权威度与LDA模型相结合,构建专家偏好档案;然后及时、精准地将新问题推荐给潜在最适宜专家,从而达到提高问答系统知识库准确性的效果.为了验证本文方法的可行性和有效性,我们使用新浪爱问真实数据集进行分析实验,实验结果表明该方法能够有效地提高专家推荐的准确率. Question answering system has become a very popular knowledge base. However,in current QA system, experts answer the question independently or the question is recommended to answerers randomly, which results in the low accuracy and promptness of question. This procedure leads to the flooding of noise knowledge in knowledge base. To solve this problem, in this paper, an expert recommendation method based on Weighted Dynamic Degree of Authority is presented. By analyzing answerers' answering history , interest profile of answerers are modeled with the mixture weighted dynamic degree of authority and the Latent Dirichlet Allocation model. Finally, the new question will be recommended to the most appropriate experts so as to improve the accuracy of the question- answer system. And we evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of our method using real dataset from Sinalask. Experiment results show that this method can improve the performance of expert recommendation comparing to the baseline method.
作者 王甜 曾承
出处 《小型微型计算机系统》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期2150-2154,共5页 Journal of Chinese Computer Systems
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(U1135005)资助 武汉晨光计划项目(2013070104010036)资助
关键词 动态权威度 LDA模型 专家推荐 知识库 问答系统 dynamic authority LDA model expert recommendation knowledge base question answering system
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Source[K]. http://searchengineland, com,2012.
  • 2Furlan B, Nikolic B, Milutinovic V. A survey of intelligent question routing system[C]. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Con- ference on Intelligent Systems, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2012 : 1-20.
  • 3Li B, King I. Routing questions to appropriate answerers in commu- nity question answering services[C]. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ,2010 : 1585-1588.
  • 4Chen L, Nayak R. Expertise analysis in a question answer portal for author ranking[C]. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM In- ternational Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Washington, USA, 2008 : 134 -140.
  • 5Kao W C,Liu D R,Wang S. Expert finding in question-answering websites:A novel hybrid approach [C]. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Sierre, Switzerland, 2010:867-871.
  • 6Zhang J,Tang J,Li J. Expert finding in a social network[C]. Pro- ceedings of 12th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Application, Bangkok, Thailand,2007 : 1066 -1069.
  • 7Liu M R, Liu Y C, Yang Q. Predictingbestanswerers for new ques- tions in communityquestion answering[C]. Proceedings of 11 tb In- ternational Conference on Weg-Age Information Management, Ji- uzhaigou, China,2010:127-138.
  • 8Riahi F,Zolaktaf Z,Shafiei M,et al. Finding expert users in com- munity question answering [C]. Proceedings of the 21st World Wide Web Conference, Lyon, France, 2012 : 791-798.
  • 9Jurcayk P, Agichtein E. Discovering authorities in question answer communities by using link analysis [C]. Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Lis- bon, Protugal, 2007 : 919 -922.
  • 10Shen J,Shen W,Fan X. Recommending experts in Q&A communities by weighted HITS algorithmiC]. International Forum on Information Technology and Applications ,Chengdu ,China ,2009:151-154.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Chen Lin,Nayak R. Expertise analysis in a question answer portal for author ranking[A].Washington,USA,2008.134-140.
  • 2Kao Weichen,Liu Duenren,Wang Shiuwen. Expert finding in question-answering websites:A novel hybrid Approach[A].2010.867-871.
  • 3Riahi F,Zolaktaf Z,Shafiei M. Finding expert users in community question answering[A].{H}Lyon,France,2012.791-798.
  • 4Qu Mingcheng,Qiu Guang,He Xiaofei. Probabilistic question recommendation for question answering communities[A].CM,2009.1229-1230.
  • 5LIU Mingrong,LIU Yicen,YANG Qing. Predicting best answerers for new questions in community question answering[A].Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2010.127-138.
  • 6Jurczyk P,Agichtein E. Discovering authorities in question answer communities by using link analysis[A].Lisboa,Portugal,2007.919-922.
  • 7Jie Shen,Wen Shen,Xin Fan. Recommending experts in Q&A communities by weighted HITS algorithm[A].Chengdu,China,2009.151-154.
  • 8Liu Jing;Song Y I;Lin C Y.Competition-based user expertise score estimation[A]{H}北京,2011425-434.
  • 9Aditya P,Rosta F,Joseph A K. Early detection of potential experts in question answering communities[A].Girona,Spain,2011.231-242.
  • 10Aditya P,Joseph A K. Expert identification in community question answering:Exploring question selection bias[A].{H}Toronto,Canada,2010.1505-1508.

共引文献11

同被引文献40

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部