期刊文献+

基于Web of Science知识共享科学研究现状及发展态势分析 被引量:6

Scientific Research Status and Development Trend of Knowledge Sharing Based on Web of Science
原文传递
导出
摘要 以Web of Science中1990~2015年收录的知识共享研究文献为数据源,运用文献计量方法和指标以及社会网络分析技术,从科学产出与影响力、学科领域、作者分布、主题及热点领域等方面进行测度。研究产出明显增长,主要集中在美英等国,美国是最主要科学生产者;美国影响力最强,中国大陆较低;研究较广泛,呈现显著的多学科性和学科融合特征;合作程度较高,尚未形成稳定的高产作者群;社会资本、社会网络、社交媒体、气候变化等主题应给以关注。 Selecting the literature on the knowledge sharing research in the Web of Science database during 1990 -2015 as data source, and combining the bibliometric methods and indexes with social network analysis techniques, the article makes an measurement in five aspects: scientific output, scientific influence, subject areas, author distribution and research topics and hot spots. The scientific research output of knowledge sharing has remarkably increased and mainly concentrates in the developed capitalist countries such as USA and England. USA is the primary scientific literature producer. The scientific influence of USA is the strongest, but China's Mainland exhibits fairly poor scientific influence. Knowledge sharing is investigated more widely and shows the significant characteristics of multidisciplinary and subject integration. The level of overall cooperation is relatively high, and has not yet formed a stable and high-yield author group. These themes such as social capital, social network, social media, climate change and other topics should be given attention to.
出处 《图书馆学研究》 CSSCI 2016年第18期20-29,共10页 Research on Library Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"基于本体论的企业默会知识转化与共享研究及应用"(项目编号:70971077)的研究成果之一
关键词 知识共享 科学影响 跨国家/区域比较 测度 knowledge sharing science influence cross-country/region comparison measure
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1马丽娜,赵蓉英,王敏.基于知识图谱的国内外企业知识共享比较研究[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(10):20-24. 被引量:5
  • 2王伟军,官思发,李亚芳.知识共享研究热点与前沿的可视化分析[J].图书情报知识,2012,29(1):115-123. 被引量:23
  • 3师桂芳.国内知识共享研究可视化分析[J].情报科学,2013,31(12):63-68. 被引量:4
  • 4Fisher R A. Some Remarks on the Methods Formulated in a Recent Article on "The Quantitative Analysis of Plant Growth. " [J]. Annals of Applied Biology, 1921, 7 (4) : 367 -372.
  • 5Mahapatra, M. On the Validity of the Theory of Exponential Growth of Scientific Literature [A]. In 5th IASLIC Conference Proceedings, IASLIC [C]. Bangalore, 1985 : 2011 -2037.
  • 6Bajwa, R. , K. Yaldram, S. Rafique. A Scientometric Assessment of Research Output in Nano-Science and Nanotechnology: Pakistan Perspective [J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94 (1): 333-342.
  • 7Hirsch J E. An Index to Quantify an Individual's Scientific Research Output [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102 (46) : 16569 -16572.
  • 8Molinari, J. F. , A. Molinari. A New Methodology for Ranking Scientific Institutions [J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 75 (1) : 163 - 174.
  • 9Bornmann L, de Moya-Anegon F, Leydesdorff L. The New Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings2011 [J]. Journal of Informetrs, 2012, 6 (2): 333 -335.
  • 10中国科技论文统计与分析课题组.2008年中国科技论文统计与分析简报[J].中国科技期刊研究,2010,21(1):23-33. 被引量:10

二级参考文献123

共引文献662

同被引文献58

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部