期刊文献+

甲状腺乳头状癌BRAFV600E突变与其超声特征的相关性研究 被引量:16

Associations of the BRAF V600E mutation with sonographic features in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨甲状腺乳头状癌(papillary thyroid carcinoma,PTC)的声像图特征与BRAF V600E基因突变的相关性。方法101个甲状腺结节细针穿刺前行灰阶超声和弹性成像检查,活检时抽取标本进行细胞学检查和BRAF V600E基因突变定性检测,其中61个PTC取得术后常规病理诊断。将61个PTC分为BRAF V600E基因突变组与BRAF V600E基因野生组,并与超声特征进行对照分析。结果82%(50/61)的甲状腺乳头状癌BRAF V600E基因为突变型,18%(11/61)为野生型;BRAF V600E基因突变组与BRAF V600E基因野生组在肿瘤的大小、形态、边缘、内部回声、有无钙化和血流情况方面差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05);BRAF V600E基因突变组中弹性评分≥4分的PTC占72%(36/50),而在BRAF V600E基因野生组中弹性评分≥4分的PTC占36.4%(4/11),两组比较差异有统计学学意义(χ2=4.933,P=0.024)。用弹性评分≥4分的PTC预测BRAF V600E突变阳性的敏感性72.0%,特异性63.6%,阳性预测值90.0%,阴性预测值33.3%,准确性70.5%,OR 4.5(95% CI 1.1~17.8)。 结论PTC弹性评分与BRAF V600E基因突变有相关性,弹性评分≥4分的结节BRAF V600E基因突变率高。 Objective To evaluate the association of the BRAF V600E mutation with sonographic features in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Methods A consecutive series of 61 papillary thyroid carcinoma(PTC) was evaluated by US and elastography before US-FNA, BRAF V600E mutation and surgery. The PTCs were categorized into 2 groups according to the results of the BRAF V61)0E mutation, BRAF-positive and BRAF-negative patients. The sonographic features were compared between BRAF- positive and BRAF-negative patients. Results The BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 82~ of patients (50 of 61 ). There were no significant difference between BRAF positive and BRAF-negative PTC on sonographic features including the nodular size, echogenicity, shape, margin, calcification and the pattern of blood flow. However the prevalence of PTC with a score higher than 4 on the Hong et al score was 72 (36/50) in the BRAF positive group, significantly higher than 36.4~ (4/11) in the BRAFnegative group ( P = 0. 024). A score higher than 4 correlated highly with a BRAF-positive diagnosis (sensitivity 72.0~, specificity 63.6~, positive predictive value 90.0~, negative predictive value 33.3~, accuracy 70.5~ and OR 4.5 ). Conclusions The BRAF V600E mutation was significantly associated with elastography classification, a score higher than 4 on the Hong et al score could highly predict the occurrence of BRAF V600E mutation in papillary thyroid cancer.
出处 《中华超声影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期785-789,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
基金 浙江省医药卫生科学研究基金计划(2013KYB129)
关键词 超声检查 甲状腺肿瘤 活组织检查 细针 BRAF V600E基因 Ultrasonography Thyroid neoplasms Biopsy, fine-needle BRAF V600E mutation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献34

  • 1Ahn, S.S., Kim, E.K., Kang, D.R., Lim, S.K., Kwak, J.Y., Kim M.J., 2010. Biopsy of thyroid nodules: comparison of three sets of guidelines. Am. J. Roentgenol., 194(1):31-37. [doi: 10.2214/A JR.09.2822].
  • 2Algin, O., Algin, E., Gokalp, G., Ocakoglu, G., Erdogan, C., Saraydaroglu, O., Tuncel, E., 2010. Role of Duplex power Doppler ultrasound in differentiation between malignant and benign thyroid nodules. Korean J. Radiol., 11(6):594-602. [doi:10.3348/kjr.2010.11.6.594].
  • 3Appetecchia, M., Solivetti, F.M., 2006. The association of col- our flow Doppler sonography and conventional ultrasono- graphy improves the diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma. Horm. Res., 66(5):249-256. [doi:10,1159/000096013].
  • 4Asteria, C., Giovanardi, A., Pizzocaro, A., Cozzaglio, L., Morabito, A., Somalvico, F., Zoppo, A., 2008. US-elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Thyroid, 18(5):523-531. [doi:10.1089/thy.2007.0323].
  • 5Bojunga, J., Hen'mann, E., Meyer, G., Weber, S., Zeuzem, S., Friedrich-Rust, M., 2010. Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis. Thyroid, 20(10):1145-1150. [cloi:10.1089/ thy.2010.0079].
  • 6Brunese, L., Romeo, A., Iorio, S., Napolitano, G., Fucili, S., Biondi, B., Vallone, G., Sodano, A., 2008. A new marker for diagnosis of thyroid papillary cancer: B-flow twin- kling sign. J. Ultrasound Med., 27(8): 1187-1194.
  • 7Cappelli, C., Castellano, M., Pirola, I., Gandossi, E., de Martino, E., Cumetti, D., Agosti, B., Rosei, E.A., 2006. Thyroid nodule shape suggests malignancy. Eur. J. Endocrinol., 155(1):27-31. [doi: 10.1530/eje. 1.02177].
  • 8Chammas, M.C., Gerhard, R., de Oliveria, I.R., Widman, A., de Barros, N., Durazzo, M., Ferraz, A., Cerri, G.G., 2005. Thyroid nodules: evaluation with power Doppler and duplex Doppler ultrasound. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 132(6):874-882. [doi:l 0.1016/j.otohns.2005.02.003].
  • 9Cooper, D.S., Doherty, G., Haugen, B.R., Kloos, R.T., Lee, S.L., Mandel, S.J., Mazzaferri, E.L., Mclver, B., Sherman, S.I., Tuttle, R.M., et al., 2006. Management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid, 16(2):109-142. [doi:10.1069/thy.2006. 16.109].
  • 10Cooper, D.S., Doherty, G.M., Haugen, B.R., Kloos, R.T., Lee, S.L., Mandel, S.J., Mazzaferri, E.L., McIver, B., Pacini, F., Schlumberger, M., et al., 2009. Revised American thyroid association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid, 19(11):1167-1214. [doi:10.1089/thy.2009.0110].

共引文献7

同被引文献99

引证文献16

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部