期刊文献+

PFOS和PFOA的水生生物基准探讨及对中国部分水体生态风险的初步评估 被引量:6

Development of Aquatic Life Criteria for PFOS and PFOA and Preliminary Assessment for the Ecological Risk of Some Water Bodies in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 全氟辛基磺酸盐(PFOS)和全氟辛酸盐(PFOA)是中国淡水环境中广泛存在的两种典型全氟类污染物,中国目前尚缺乏PFOS和PFOA的淡水水生生物基准值。收集PFOS和PFOA对中国本土水生生物的毒性数据,利用美国环境保护局推荐的物种敏感度排序法推算了这两种物质的水生生物基准,获得PFOS的急性和慢性基准阈值分别为32.9μg·L^(-1)和1.97μg·L^(-1),PFOA的急性和慢性基准阈值分别为46.1 mg·L^(-1)和5.46 mg·L^(-1),两者的基准阈值表现出数量级的差异。针对中国部分淡水水体中PFOS和PFOA的污染水平,采用商值法(RQ)评价了两种污染物的生态风险,结果表明,PFOS和PFOA尚未对中国淡水环境中水生生物产生风险,处于可以接受的程度。 Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) are widely existing as two typical perfluorinated pollutants in water body in China. There are no aquatic life criteria for PFOS and PFOA in China now. In this study, we collected the toxic data of PFOS and PFOA on local species in China to develop the aquatic life criteria using the sensitive species rank method (SSR) recommended by US Environmental Protection Agent (US EPA). The results showed that the acute and chronic criterion values were 32.9 μg·L^-1 and 1.97 μg·L^-1 for PFOS, 46.1 mg·L^-1 and 5.46 mg·L^-1 for PFOA, respectively, which had the difference of magnitude. The ecological risk of PFOS and PFOA exposed in the part of the freshwater bodies were assessed by the risk quotient (RQ) method and the results showed that PFOS and PFOA had not posed significant ecological risk, which was at the acceptable level.
出处 《生态环境学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期1188-1194,共7页 Ecology and Environmental Sciences
基金 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2012ZX07501-003) 科技基础性工作专项(2014FY120606) 国家自然科学基金项目(21407139)
关键词 全氟辛基磺酸盐 全氟辛酸盐 水生生物基准 生态风险 PFOS PFOA aquatic life criteria ecological risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献51

  • 1JEFFREY B, STEVENS J B. 2007. Surface water quality criterion forperfluorooctanoic acid[EB/OL]. http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html.
  • 2STEVENS J B. 2007a. Surface water quality criterion for perfluorooctanoicacid [R]. Minnesota: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
  • 3STEVENS J B. 2007b. Surface water quality criterion for perfluorooctanesulfonic acid [R]. Minnesota:Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
  • 4BECKER A M, GERSTMANN S, FRANK H. 2010. Perfluorooctanoic acidand perfluorooctane sulfonate in two fish species collected from theRoter Main River, Bayreuth, Germany [J]. Bulletin Of EnvironmentalContamination And Toxicology, 84(1): 132-135.
  • 5BOUDREAU T. 2002. Toxicological evaluation of perfluorinated organicacids to selected freshwater primary and secondary trophic levels underlaboratory and semi-natural field conditions [R]. Guelph (ON):University of Guelph, Department of Environmental Biology.
  • 6BOUDREAU T M, SIBLEY P K, MABURY S A, et al. 2003. Laboratoryevaluation of the toxicity of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) onSelenastrum capricornutum, Chlorella vulgaris, Lemna gibba,Daphnia magna, and Daphnia pulicaria [J]. Archives ofEnvironmental Contamination & Toxicology, 44(3): 307-313.
  • 7BROOKE D, FOOTITT A, NWAOGU T. 2004. Environmental riskevaluation report: Perfluorooctanesulphonate (PFOS) [R]. UnitedKingdom: Environment Agency Wallingford.
  • 83M COMPANY. 1978.Acute Toxicity to Fish: 96-Hour Toxicity Test inBluegills [R]. St. Paul, MN.
  • 93M COMPANY. 1987. 96-H Acute Static Toxicity to Fatheadminnow-FC126 [R]. St. Paul, MN.
  • 103M COMPANY. 2010. Technical Review and Reassessment of the UKEnvironmental Risk Evaluation Report for Perfluorooctanesulfonate(PFOS) [R]. St. Paul, MN.

二级参考文献300

共引文献318

同被引文献73

引证文献6

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部