论“博徒”之毋庸再议

The Dispute of “Botu”—Needless to Reconsider

关于"博徒"一词的争端,初起于20世纪80年代。进入21世纪以后,在李金坤、李定广等学者的商榷下,这一问题变得复杂。近几年,学界又出现了折衷主义的论调,把这一问题越搅越浑。通过对《辨骚》篇的行文结构以及四同、四异的具体分析,"博徒"在这里并无贬义。刘勰对《离骚》极为推崇,《辨骚》篇乃"枢纽之枢纽"。

The dispute about ＂Botu＂began in the 1980 s. Entering into the 21 st century,the relevant discussion by Li Jinkun and Li Dingguang made this problem more complex. In recent years,the emerging eclecticism tune in academic circles has made this problem more confused. Through the specific analysis of the structure, four similarities and four differences of Defense of Li Sao, it can be figured out that ＂ Botu ＂ here contains no derogatory sense. Liu Xie speak highly of The Lament（Li Sao）and Defense of Li Sao is＂ the core of core ＂in The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons.