摘要
目的:探讨唾液酸酶法在细菌性阴道病(Bv)临床检测中的诊断价值。方法:严格按照唾液酸酶法检测试剂盒操作说明书进行操作,同时使用Amsel法进行检测对照,并对两者的结果进行比较。结果:467例疑似细菌性阴道病样本中,唾液酸酶法检出阳性样本例数为136例,阳性率为29.1%;Amsel法检出阳性样本例数为129例,阳性率为27.6%。差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:唾液酸酶法检测BV具有操作简便、设备简单、结果直观、特异性强等优点,可以代替Amsel法用于门诊患者的BV筛查。
Objective:To explore the diagnostic value of the sialidase method in clinical examination of bacterial vaginosis(BV).Methods:Observing and comparing the results obtained by using sialidase assay kit and that by using Amsel assay.Results:Among the results of 467 cases of suspected bacterial vaginal disease,there were 136 cases detected as positive by using the sialidase method(29.1%);and there were 129 cases detected as positive by using the Amsel method(27.6%).The difference is not statistically significant(P〉0.05).Conclusion:Sialic acid enzymatic method in detection BV has the advantages of easy operation,simple equipment,visual result,and strong specificity etc.The method can replace Amsel in BV screening for outpatients.
出处
《中外女性健康研究》
2016年第13期5-6,共2页
Women's Health Research