期刊文献+

沃林格艺术理论之反思 被引量:1

Reflections on Wallinger's Theory of Art
下载PDF
导出
摘要 沃林格的艺术研究缺乏语境意识,脱离了艺术产生的具体文化语境。他仅关注艺术的形式特征,忽视了其文化属性与功能。在他的理论体系中,艺术及艺术史是被建构起来的,而非如其所是地呈现的。沃林格的抽象冲动并非专属于艺术领域,而是一种普遍的精神欲求。它具有类型化的特质,不涉及艺术的内在机制。他认为抽象形式源自于艺术之外的先验存在,而非艺术发展的结果。他的抽象理论与史实不符合,倒置了因果关系。在他那里,抽象始终游离于艺术之外,成为艺术之外的先验存在。 Wallinger′s study of art lacks a contextual awareness and consequently neglects the specific cultural context in which art is produced.He is only concerned with the formal characteristics of art and ignores its cultural attributes and func-tions.In his theory, art and art history are constructed rather than presented.His idea of abstract impulse isn′t specific to the field of art, but is a common spiritual desire.It has characteristics of type and doesn′t involve the internal mechanism of art. He believes that the abstract form derives from a prior existence outside of art, rather than the result of artistic development. His theory is inconsistent with historical facts and inverts the causal relationship.With him the abstract is always separated from art and becomes the prior existence outside of art.
作者 马草
机构地区 南开大学哲学院
出处 《美育学刊》 2016年第5期116-120,共5页 Journal of Aesthetic Education
关键词 沃林格 工艺 建构 语境 抽象 Wallinger crafts construct context abstract
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献156

  • 1傅其林.论布达佩斯学派对艺术制度理论的批判[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2005,11(3):323-328. 被引量:2
  • 2张法.迪基《美学导论》与中国美学原理写作的差异[J].人文杂志,2006(4):70-74. 被引量:2
  • 3Diffey, T.J.1984. The Sociological Challenge to Aesthetics. British Journal of Aesthetics 24(2): 169.
  • 4See Flores, Toni 1985. The Anthropology of Aesthetics, Dialectical Anthropology 10 (1/2):27-41.
  • 5Coote, Jeremy 1989. The Anthropology of Aesthet- ics and the Dangers of 'Maquet centrism'. Journal qf the Anthropological Society of" Oxford 20(3): 229-243.
  • 6Maquet, Jacques J.1979. Introduction to A esthetic Anthropology. Malibu: Undena Publications.
  • 7Rossi, Ino 1980.1ntroduction.In:Rossi,I.(ed.), People in Culture. A Survey of Cultural Anthropology. New York: Praeger, 1.
  • 8Anderson, Richard L. 1990. Calliope's Sisters. A Comparative Study of Philophies of Art. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 3.
  • 9E.g., Sturtevant, William C. 1964. Studies in Ethnoscience. In: Romney, A.k., and d'Andrade, R.G.(eds), Transcultural Studies in Cognition, 99-131.
  • 10E.g.,Tyler, Stephen A. 1969(ed.). Cognitive Anthropology. New York, Chicago, San Francisco: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

共引文献22

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部