期刊文献+

水产品中麻痹性贝类毒素的评价及相关研究

Assessment and related research of paralytic shellfish poisons in aquatic products
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对185批水产品中的麻痹性贝类毒素(PSP)进行评价和相关的方法学研究。方法采用国际公认的标准方法——小鼠生物法,检测水产品中的麻痹性贝类毒素,并与酶联免疫吸附(ELISA)方法进行比对。结果在185批水产品中检测出PSP超过国家标准的产品共5批,超标率为2.7%,小鼠生物法和ELISA方法的评价结果完全一致。结论采用小鼠生物法测得到的PSP检测结果可以为摄入PSP的风险评估提供有力的数据支持。 Objective To assess paralytic shellfish poisons (PSP) in 185 batches of aquatic products and study on the detection methods. Methods The PSP in aquatic products were detected by mouse bioassay, which was the internationally accepted standard method, and compared with the results detected by ELISA method. Results Within 185 batches of aquatic products, there were 5 batches, whose PSP values were higher than the national standard, with the exceeding rate of 2.7%. The assessment results of mouse bioassay and ELISA were exactly the same. Conclusion The detected values of PSP by mouse bioassay can provide strong data support for the risk assessment of PSP intake.
作者 黄卓 王依群 唐黎明 HUANG Zhuo WANG Yi-Qun TANG Li-Ming(Shanghai Institute for Food and Drug Control, Shanghai 201203, China)
出处 《食品安全质量检测学报》 CAS 2016年第7期2630-2633,共4页 Journal of Food Safety and Quality
关键词 麻痹性贝类毒素 小鼠生物法 风险评估 paralytic shellfish poisons mouse bioassay risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1Halstead,BW,Schantz,EJ.Paralytic shellfish poisoning.WHO Offset PublicationWorld Health Organization,Geneva,Switzerland.1984,79:1-60.
  • 2世界卫生组织(WHO) http://www.who.int/home-page/[OL].
  • 3世界卫生组织食品安全网 http://www.who.int/fsf/[OL].
  • 4Van Egmond,HP,Speyers,GJA,van den Top,HJ Current situation on worldwide regulations for marine phycotoxins[J].Journal of Natural Toxins,1992,1(1):67-86.
  • 5Van Egmond,HP,Aune,Y,Lassus,P,Speijers,GJA,Waldock,M.Paralytic and diarrhoeic shellfish poisons:Occurrence in Europe,toxicity,analysis and regulation[J].Journal of Natural Toxins,1993,2(1):41-83.
  • 6Leftley,JW,Hannah,F.Phycotoxins in seafood[J].In:Watson,DH (ed.) Natural toxicants in food,1998.
  • 7ANZFA Shellfish toxins in food:A toxicological review and risk assessment[J].Australia New Zealand Food Authority,Canberra,Sheffield,Sheffield Academic,pp.1999,(8):182-224.
  • 8美国FDA食品安全与应用营养中心(CFSAN)http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/list.html[OL].
  • 9国际食品法典委员会(CAC) http://www.codexalimentarius.net/[OL].
  • 10联合国粮农组织(FAO) http://www.fao.org/default.htm[OL].

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部