期刊文献+

双倍剂量氯吡格雷对冠心病支架植入术后氯吡格雷低反应患者的疗效及安全性研究 被引量:3

Efficacy and safety of double-dose clopidogrel treatment in patients with clopidogrel low response after percutaneous coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估双倍剂量氯吡格雷强化抗栓1个月与常规剂量相比对冠心病经皮冠状动脉支架植入(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)术后氯吡格雷低反应性(clopidogrel low response,CLR)患者血小板聚集功能的影响及安全性。方法:将冠心病PCI术后通过光学血小板聚集仪检测发现的CLR患者92例随机分为常规剂量组与双倍剂量组,观察两组患者1个月后血小板聚集功能的变化并随访1年的临床预后及安全性。结果:在住院期间两组患者的二磷酸腺苷诱导的血小板聚集率(adenosine diphosphate induced platelet aggregation,PLADP)无显著差异(P>0.05);但在1个月随访时双倍剂量组的PLADP显著低于常规剂量组(P<0.001);1年随访主要不良事件在两组间的发生率均为4.3%。常规剂量组的次要不良事件发生率高于双倍剂量组,主要表现为心源性再入院率显著高于双倍剂量组(P<0.01)。双倍剂量组大出血(0%vs.0%)、小出血(0%vs.0%)、轻微出血(10.9%vs.10.9%)的发生率与常规剂量组相当。结论:与常规剂量组相比,双倍剂量氯吡格雷强化抗栓1个月能显著降低氯吡格雷低反应患者的血小板聚集率,显著降低1年随访的心源性再入院率,且未增加出血风险。 Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of double-dose clopidogrel compared with routine-dose dual anti-platelet treatment(DAPT)in patients with clopidogrel low response(CLR)after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). Methods:Ninety-two CLR patients were screened by light transmission aggregometry(LTA)after PCL and randomly divided into the clopidogrel routine-dose group and the clopidogrel double-dose group after taking routine-dose aspirin and clopidogrel for more than five days. Platelet aggregation was determined by LTA one-month post-randomization. The patients were followed up and all clinical events were recorded for one year. Results:There was no significant difference of adenosine diphosphate induced platelet aggregation(PLADP)between the two groups at baseline(P〈0.05). However,the PLADPlevel of the double-dose group was significantly lower than that of the routine-dose group at one-month follow-up(P〈0.001). The major adverse event rates of the two groups were both 4.3%. The double-dose group presented less secondary adverse events compared with the double-dose group,mainly attributed to cardiac rehospitalization(P〈0.01). The two groups showed comparable major bleed events(0% vs. 0%),as well as minor and minimal bleeding events(0% vs. 0% and 10.9% vs. 10.9%,respectively). Conclusion:Double-dose clopidogrel can significantly improve the ADP-induced platelet aggregation during the first month and may lower the cardiac rehospitalization event without excessive risk of bleeding in CLR patients undergoing PCI during one-year follow-up.
出处 《南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期967-972,共6页 Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金(81170181)
关键词 氯吡格雷低反应性 经皮冠状动脉支架植入术 血小板聚集率 个体化抗血小板治疗 clopidogrel low response percutaneous coronary intervention platelet aggregation individualized anti-platelet treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2012(简本)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2012,40(4):271-277. 被引量:426
  • 2Windecker S,Kolh P,Alfonso F,et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization:the kask force on myocardial revascularization of the European society of cardiology (ESC)and the European association for cardio- thoracic surgery(EACTS)developed with the special con- tribution of the European association of pereutaneous car- diovascular interventions (EAPCI)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2014,35 (37) : 2541-2619.
  • 3无.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2015,43(5):380-393. 被引量:2307
  • 4Mega JL,Close SL,Wiviott SD,et al. Cytochrome p450polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel [J~. J Vasc Surg, 2009,360 (4) :354-362.
  • 5孔德玉,陈俊,李春坚,朱甜甜,张秋,刘洁,龚晓璇,张定国,贾恩志,陈波,陈磊磊,贾庆哲,戴振华,杨志健.冠心病患者阿司匹林与氯吡格雷抵抗发生情况的调查研究[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2013,33(6):788-791. 被引量:15
  • 6Price M J, Angiolillo DJ,Teirstein PS, et al. Platelet reac- tivity and cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention:a time-dependent analysis of the Gauging Responsiveness with a VerifyNow P2Y12 assay: Impact on Thrombosis and Safety(GRAVITAS)trial [J]. Circulation, 2011,124(10) : 1132-1137.
  • 7Rajendran S, Parikh D,Shugman I,et al. High on treat- ment platelet reactivity and stent thrombosis E J]. Heart Lung Circ,2011,20(8) :525-531.
  • 8Gum PA,Kottke-Marchant K,Poggio ED,et al. Profile and prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with cardio- vascular disease [ J ]. Am J Cardiol, 2001,88 (3) : 230-235.
  • 9Bonello L,Tantry US,Mareucci R,et al. Consensus and future directions on the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010,56(12) :919-933.
  • 10Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syn- dromes without ST-segment elevation[J]. N Engl J Med, 2001,345 (7):494-502.

二级参考文献39

  • 1Collaborative Research Group of Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction.重组葡激酶与重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗急性心肌梗死的随机多中心临床试验[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(8):691-696. 被引量:43
  • 2Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J,2010 , 31:2501-2555.
  • 3Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation, 2011, 124 :e574-651.
  • 4Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011,58 :e123-210.
  • 5Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation ( EuroSCORE ). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999,16:9-13.
  • 6Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2009,360:961- 972.
  • 7Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55:1923-1932.
  • 8Online STS fish calculator [ S/OL]. [ 2012-01-01 ]. http:// riskcalc, sts. org/STSWebRiskCalc273/de, aspx.
  • 9Mehta SR, Tanguay JF, Eikelboom JW, et al. Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes ( CURRENT-OASIS 7 ): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet,2010,376 : 1233-1243.
  • 10Mehta SR, Granger CB, Eikelboom JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial. J Am Cell Cardiol,2007,50 : 1742-1751.

共引文献2716

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部