期刊文献+

汉语(非)现实范畴的显赫性与扩张性——跨语言原型范畴化视角 被引量:12

The mightiness and expansion of(ir)realis category in Chinese:From a perspective of prototype categorization across languages
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文提出跨语言(非)现实(realis/irrealis)和时-体-情态之间的显赫(mightiness)非均衡性假设,试图通过论证(非)现实为汉语的显赫范畴且具扩张性,来阐释汉语时-体-情态的形式纠缠问题,并初步验证我们提出的假设。本研究结论如下:1)人类对客观世界认知的范畴化在(非)现实范畴中产生原型效应和层级系统,(非)现实的原型范畴在不同语言中有别,时-体-情态三个基本层次范畴以家族相似性聚合在(非)现实这一更高层次范畴下。2)(非)现实和时-体-情态之间存在显赫非均衡性,该假设具有跨语言普适性。当(非)现实为非显赫范畴时,下位层级上时-体-情态中任一范畴在不同语言中都可能成为显赫范畴;当(非)现实本身显赫时,时-体-情态中任一范畴倾向于非显赫。3)汉语中(非)现实是一个显赫范畴,而时-体-情态均为非显赫范畴,领属/存在范畴是汉语显赫(非)现实进行扩张的非原型范畴。 This paper puts forward the hypothesis of uneven mightiness between(ir)realis and tense-aspect-modality across languages.By proving that(ir)realis is a mighty category and thus has the feature of expansion in Chinese,we try to expose the nature of tangling expression forms of tenseaspect-modality and also conduct a preliminary test of our hypothesis.The results are as follows:1)The cognitive categorization of the objective world by humans leads to prototypical effect and hierarchical system in the(ir)realis category.The prototype of(ir)realis varies in different languages.The three categories of tense-aspect-modality with family resemblance on the basic level are collected under the higher level of(ir)realis.2)Mightiness has an uneven distribution between(ir)realis and tense-aspect-modality.This hypothesis is proved by facts across languages.When(ir)realis is not mighty,any category among tense-aspect-modality can be mighty in different languages,but when(ir)realis is mighty,any category among tense-aspect-modality tends to be not mighty.3)In Chinese(ir)realis is a mighty category but tense-aspect-modality isn't mighty.The possession/existence category is an(ir)realis expansion to its non-prototype.
作者 于秀金
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期680-692,800,共13页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 国家社科基金项目"平衡语种样本视阈下时-体范畴的类型与共性研究"(15BYY174)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Bhat, D. 1999. The Prominence of Tense, Aspect and Mood[M]. Amsterdam: John Benja- mins.
  • 2Binnick, R. 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 3Bugenhagen, R. 1994. The semantics of irrealis in the Austronesian languages of Papua New Guinea [A]. In G. Reesink (ed.). Topics in Descriptive Austronesian Linguistics [C]. Leiden: Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden. 1-39.
  • 4Bybee, J., R. Perkins & W, Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar : Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 5Chafe, W. 1995. The realis-irrealis distinction in Caddo, the Northern Iroquoian Languages, and English [A]. In J. Bybee & S. Fleischman (eds.). Modality in Grammar and Discourse[C]. Amsterdam: John Beniamins. 349-365.
  • 6Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 7Comrie, B. 1985. Tense [M]. Cambridge. CUP.
  • 8Dahl, O. 1985. Tense and Aspect System [M]. Bath: The Bath Press.
  • 9Donohue, M. 1999. A Grammar of Tukang Besi [M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 10Gijn, R. & S. Gipper. 2009. Irrealis in Yurakar6 and other languages. On the cross-linguistic consistency of an elusive category [A]. In L. Hogeweg, H. de. Hoop & A. Malchukov ( eds.). Cross-linguistic Semantics of Tense, Aspect and Modality [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 155-178.

二级参考文献175

共引文献673

同被引文献158

引证文献12

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部