期刊文献+

《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第21条、第22条释评

On the Article 21 and Article 22 of the Act of Application of Laws over Foreign-related Civil Relationship
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第21条、第22条专门就涉外结婚的法律适用问题作出规定,就原有规则作出大幅度修改,体现了立法的进步,但学界就该两条规则的适用范围和具体解释有较大的分歧。对比分析学者的迥异观点,可发现各类观点均缺乏足够的说服力。涉外结婚实际上涉及涉外婚姻的缔结和有效性判定两个层面的问题,应当从不同的层面准确理解第21条、第22条的适用范围。第21条主要指向涉外婚姻缔结的实质要件,第22条则只能用于判定涉外婚姻的形式有效性。就涉外婚姻缔结的形式要件,以及涉外婚姻的实质有效性判定的法律适用问题,则需通过法律解释的方法予以补充和明确。 The article 21 and article 22 of the Act of Application of Laws over Foreign-related Civil Relationship specify the applicable rules of foreign-related marriage, revising the former provisions and presenting the progress of legislation. Some different opinions lie in the scope and interpretation of these two provisions. It has been proved that there are various defects of the existing opinions. In order to clear the articles' applicable scope, it is reasonable to distinguish the establishment of foreign-related marriage from the validity of foreign-related marriage. Article 21 is used to define the substantial requirements of the establishment of foreign-related marriage, and article 22 concerns the formal requirements of the validity of foreign-related marriage. With regard to the applicable law of substantial requirements of the validity of foreign-related marriage and formal requirements of establishment of foreign-related marriage, it is necessary for government to use the legal interpretation to complement and specify them.
作者 罗芳
出处 《北京化工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第3期9-14,共6页 Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 涉外结婚 涉外婚姻的缔结 涉外婚姻的有效性 实质要件 形式要件 foreign-related marriage the establishment of foreign-related marriage the validity of foreign-relatedmarriage substantial requirements formal requirements
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献54

  • 1黄进,郭华成.澳门国际私法中的国籍、住所和惯常居所[J].政法论坛,1997,15(4):99-107. 被引量:5
  • 2杜焕芳.《委内瑞拉国际私法立法改革述评及其启示》,载《民商法论丛》2003年第2号(总第27卷),金桥文化出版(香港)有限公司2003年版,第465页.
  • 3《民法通则》第15条.
  • 4Aude Fiomi,Rome 111 - Choice of Law in Divorce: Is the Europeanization of Family Law Going Too Far? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 22(2008), p. 178.
  • 5Commission Staff Working Document, Annex to the proposal for a Council Regulation Amending Regulation(EC) No. 2201/2003. http :// ec. europa, eu/justice/doc centre/civil/doc/sec_2006_949_en, pdf, visited on Oct. 3,2010.
  • 6http ://www. familylawweek, co. uk/site, aspx? i = fo7,访问日期:2010-10-03.
  • 7Katharina Boele- W oelki, The New European Choice -of-Law Revolution: Lessons for the Urtited States? Family Law: The Legal Recognition of Same- Sex Relationships Within the European Union (May, 2008 ) 82 Tul. L. Rev. 1949, p. 1963.
  • 8德国2001年2月16日《同性生活伴侣关系法》.
  • 9瑞士2004年6月18日《同性伴侣关系法》.
  • 10奥地利共和国《关于经注册的同性伴侣关系的联邦法律》(2010年1月1日起施行).

共引文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部