摘要
从书写的内容着手考证是书法作品真伪鉴定的重要方法之一。经查证,传世黄庭坚《行书十二条屏》墨本所写两首七言律诗是赓和乾隆五十七年(1792)御制两首七律元韵而作的诗,若非亲身参与其事的大臣所作,就是晚清作伪书家的模拟之作,同黄庭坚无关。所谓黄庭坚书写韩伯庸《幽兰赋》,较《文苑英华》所载韩伯庸原作多出十句,改动之处拙劣,亦是伪作无疑。
Analyzing the contents of writing is one of the important methods to discriminate calligraphy works. It has been verified that Huang Tingjian's "Running script article twelve screens" is the follow-up works of the two rhyme poems of Qianlong Emperor in 1792, which may be made by the Minister of personal involvement, or simulated by the calligrapher in the late Qing. That is to say, it is nothing with Huang Tingjian. Another work, Orchids Fu by Han boyong, written by Huang Tingjian has more ten clumsy sentences than the original in the IVenyuanyinghua. Therefore, it must have been forged by some calligrapher in the late Qing.
出处
《北京化工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2016年第3期48-53,共6页
Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
黄庭坚
行书十二条屏
幽兰赋
辨伪
Huang Tingjian
Running script article twelve screens
Orchids Fu
discrimination