期刊文献+

老年住院患者日常生活能力评估与衰弱指数评估的相关性研究 被引量:22

Correlation research of elderly inpatients′ADL assessment and frailty index
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:应用日常生活能力评定方法与衰弱指数评估方法评价75岁及以上老年住院患者的一般健康状态,了解两种评估方法的相关性。方法采用横断面研究方法收集2014年9月—2015年2月首都医科大学附属复兴医院老年科75岁及以上住院患者88例。分别应用Barthel指数日常生活活动评定量表和Rockwood学者构建的衰弱指数评估量表进行评估,了解患者的一般健康情况,比较两种评估方法的相关性。结果 Spearman相关分析显示两种评估方法成负相关性( r=-0.810,P〈0.001)。结论对于75岁及以上老年住院患者,日常生活能力评定方法与衰弱指数评估方法均能反映患者的一般健康状况,日常生活能力评定方法方便简洁,护士易于操作,患者配合度高。 Objective To compare the correlation of two assessment methods, frailty index( FI) and activity of daily living( ADL) , which were used to evaluate the health condition in elderly hospitalized patients of 75 years old or over. Methods The cross section study was conducted from September 2014 to February 2015, which included data from participants aged 75 and over(n=88) in Fuxing Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University. Patients′ general healthy condition were evaluated by FI rating scale according to Rockwood frailty index rating scale and Barthel index of daily life activities rating scale respectively.Results Spearman correlation analysis showed that FI was negatively correlated with ADL(r=-0.810,P〈0.001).Conclusions Both ADL and FI can reflect the health condition in elderly hospitalized patients ( aged 75 or over ) , and ADL is simple, convenient and easy to evaluate and patients′compliance is favorable.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2016年第22期3163-3165,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 老年人 住院病人 日常生活能力评估 衰弱指数 Elderly Hospitalized patient Activity of daily living Frailty index
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

  • 1Allison,P.(2002).Missing data.Thousand Oaks,California:Sage Publications.
  • 2Evert,J.,Lawler,E.,Bogan,H.,& Perls,T.(2003).Morbidity profiles of centenarians:Survivors,delayers,and escapers.Journal of Gerontology:Biological Sciences & Med Sciences 58(A):232-237.
  • 3Field,M.J.,& Cassell,C.K.(1997).Approaching death:improving care at the end of life.Washing DC:National Academic Press.
  • 4George,L.K.(2002).Research design in end-of-life research:State of science.The Gerontologist 42(special issue Ⅲ):86-98.
  • 5Gill,T.M.,Robison,J.T.,& Tinetti,M.E.(1997).Predictors of recovery in activities of daily living among disabled older persons living in the community.Journal of General Internal Medicine 12:757-762.
  • 6Goggins,W.B.,Woo,J.,Sham,A.,& Ho,S.C.(2005).Frailty index as a measure of biological age in a Chinese population.Journal of Gerontology:Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences 60A:M1046-1051.
  • 7Gu,D.(2007).General data assessment of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey in 2002.In Y.Zeng,D.Poston,D.A.Vlosky,& D.Gu (eds).Healthy longevity in China:Demographic,socioeconomic,and psychological dimensions (forthcoming).New York:Springer Publisher.
  • 8Gu,D.,& Zeng,Y.(2004).Sociodemographic effects on the onset and recovery of ADL disability among Chinese oldest-old.Demographic Research 11:1-42.
  • 9Hattori,K.,McCubbin,M.A.,& Ishida,D.N.(2006).Concept analysis of good death in the Japanese community.Journal of Nursing Scholarship 38(2):165-170.
  • 10Hinton,J.(1996).How reliable are relative's retrospective reports of terminal illness? Patients and relatives'accounts compared.Social Science & Medicine 43:1229-1236.

共引文献104

同被引文献194

引证文献22

二级引证文献186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部