期刊文献+

关系视角的高校科研团队断裂带对隐性知识转移影响研究 被引量:9

Effect of Team Faultlines on the Tacit Knowledge Transfer in the Scientific Research Team of University from the Perspective of Relationship
原文传递
导出
摘要 团队断裂带的研究重点已由断裂带的测量、维度界定扩展到对其前因及结果变量的深入探讨,但团队断裂带与隐性知识转移的研究尚不多见。本文将团队成员的关系引入团队断裂带的研究,探索不同关系维度在团队断裂带和隐性知识转移中的作用机制。对116个高校科研团队的实证研究表明:信息认知断裂带、感情和人情对隐性知识转移具有显著正向影响,社会分类断裂带对隐性知识转移具有负向影响;在不同关系维度作用下,信息认知断裂带和社会分类断裂带对隐性知识转移的作用机制存在明显差异。研究结论不仅完善了团队断裂带对隐性知识转移的作用过程,还对识别中国情境下关系文化的作用机制,促进团队隐性知识转移具有理论价值和实践启示。 The focus of team faultlines research has expanded from faultlines measurements, dimensions definition to fur-ther discussion of antecedents and outcome variables, but the relationship research between team faultlines and tacit knowl-edge transfer is still rare. In this paper, the team member's relationship is introduced into team faultlines research, andmechanism of team member's relationship exerted on the team faultlines and tacit knowledge transfer is explored. An em-pirical study of 116 innovative college team shows that information recognition faultlines,ganqing and renqing has a signifi-cant positive impact on tacit knowledge transfer, and social categorization faultlines has a negative impact on tacit knowl-edge transfer; and with different guidances of relationship, the mechanism of action which information recognition faultlinesand social categorization faultlines exert to tacit knowledge transfer is distinctly different. Conclusions not only perfects themechanism team faultlines exert to tacit knowledge transfer, but also provides theoretical value and practical enlightenmentto promote team tacit knowledge transfer.
作者 杨陈 唐明凤
出处 《情报科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第10期20-25,共6页 Information Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71401021 71403221)
关键词 关系 团队断裂带 隐性知识转移 调节效应 relationship team faultlines tacit knowledge transfer moderating effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Ren H, Gray B, Harrison D A. Triggering faultline ef-fects in teams: The importance of bridging friendshipties and breaching animosity ties [J].Organization Sci-ence, 2015, 26(2):390-404.
  • 2韩立丰,王重鸣.群体断层强度测量指标的构建与检验:一个整合的视角[J].心理学报,2010,42(11):1082-1096. 被引量:12
  • 3Thatcher SMB, Jehn K A, Zanutto E. Cracks in di-versity research: The effects of diversity faultlines onconflict and performance [J]. Group Decision and Ne-gotiation, 2003, 12(3): 217 - 241.
  • 4Jehn K A, Bezrukova K. The faultline activation pro-cess and the effects of activated faultlines on coalitionformation, conflict, and group outcomes [J].Organiza-tional Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2010, 112(1): 24-42.
  • 5陈伟,杨早立,朗益夫.团队断裂带对团队效能影响的实证研究——关系型领导行为的调节与交互记忆系统的中介[J].管理评论,2015,27(4):99-110. 被引量:42
  • 6Bezrukova K, Jehn K A, Zanutto E L, et al. Do work-group faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model offaultlines, team identification, and group perfor-mance [J].Organization Science, 2009, 20(3):35-50.
  • 7Dahlin K B, Hinds P J. Team diversity and informa-tion use [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005,48(6): 1107-1123.
  • 8Shin S J, Kim T Y, Lee J Y, et al. Cognitive team diversityand individual team member creativity: A cross-level inter-action [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012,55(1):197-212.
  • 9Hamel G .Competition for competence and inter-partnerlearning within international strategic alliances [J].StrategicManagement Journal, 1991, 12(S1):83-103.
  • 10Hansen M T. The search-transfer problem: The role ofweak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits[J] .Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999,44(1) :82-111.

二级参考文献134

  • 1张晓燕,李元旭.论内在激励对隐性知识转移的优势作用[J].研究与发展管理,2007,19(1):28-33. 被引量:32
  • 2魏光兴,蒲勇健.互惠动机与激励:实验证据及其启示[J].科技管理研究,2007,27(3):254-256. 被引量:8
  • 3Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., Zanutto, E. L., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2009). Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science, 20, 35-50.
  • 4Bezrukova, K., Thatcher, S. M. B., & Jehn, K. A. (2007). Group heterogeneity and faultlines: Comparing alignment and dispersion theories of group composition. In K. J. Behfar & L. L. Thompson (Eds.), Conflict in organizational groups: New directions in theory and practice (pp. 57-92). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • 5Esteban, J., & Ray, D. (1994). On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica, 62, 819-851.
  • 6Gibson, C., & Vermeulen, F. (2003). A healthy divide: Subgroup as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 202-239.
  • 7Homan, A. C., van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1189-1199.
  • 8Jobson, J. D. (1992). Applied Multivariate Data Analysis, Volume II: Categorical and Multivariate Methods. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • 9Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325-340.
  • 10Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (2005). Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal 48, 645-659.

共引文献131

同被引文献225

引证文献9

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部