期刊文献+

XELOX方案治疗高、中分化结直肠腺癌与低分化结直肠腺癌的临床疗效差异分析 被引量:3

Difference effect of XELOX regimen on high- moderate differentiated and low differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察低分化结直肠腺癌与高中分化结直肠腺癌用XELOX方案治疗的临床疗效差异。方法 80例结直肠腺癌患者分为对照组40例(低分化结直肠腺癌)和试验组40例(高、中分化结直肠腺癌)。2组患者均使用XELOX方案进行治疗,第1天,静脉滴注奥沙利铂130 mg·m^(-2),滴注3 h,第1~14天,口服卡培他滨1000 mg·m^(-2),早晚各1次,持续用药2周,3周为1个疗程,共治疗3个疗程。观察2组患者治疗前后人转录激活因子5(ATF5)mRNA及B细胞淋巴瘤^(-2)(Bcl^(-2))mRNA相对含量的变化,比较2组患者的临床疗效、药物不良反应发生率,观察2组患者的远期生存率。结果治疗后,试验组ATF5mRNA相对含量为0.43±0.07,Bcl^(-2) mRNA相对含量为0.33±0.04,对照组的ATF5 mRNA相对含量为1.52±0.09,Bcl^(-2) mRNA相对含量为0.78±0.10,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组总有效率为87.50%(35/40例),对照组总有效率为60.00%(24/40例,P<0.05)。试验组1,2,3年的生存率分别为87.50%(35/40例),72.50%(29/40例),42.50%(17/40例),对照组1,2,3年的生存率分别为50.00%(20/40例),32.50%(13/40例),7.50%(3/40例),2组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。药物不良反应主要表现为中性粒细胞减少、手足反应综合征和恶心呕吐,试验组药物不良反应发生率为15.00%(6/40例),对照组为72.50%(29/40例,P<0.05)。结论由于高、中分化结直肠癌和低分化结直肠癌的病理特点有所不同,临床上对不同分化期的治疗应采取不同的治疗方式,以达到最有效的治疗方式。 Objective To investigate the difference effect of XELOX regimen in the treatment of high and moderate- grade colorectal adenocarcinoma and low- grade colorectal adenocarcinoma. Methods Eighty colorectal cancer patients were divided into two groups according to the differentiation,40 cases in control group was low- grade colorectal adenocarcinoma,and 40 cases in treatment group was high and moderate-grade colorectal adenocarcinoma. Two groups of patients were treated with XELOX regimen( intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin 130 mg·m-2for 3 h at 1stday,orally given capecitabine 1000 mg·m-2from 1-14 d,twice a day). Three weeks a course,the treatment was continued for3 courses. The changes of activating transcription factor 5( ATF5)mRNA and B- cell lymphoma 2( Bcl-2) mRNA in two groups wereobserved before and after treatment,the clinical efficacy and adverse drug reaction in two groups were observed. The long- term survival rate was observed by following- up for three years. Results After treatment,the levels of ATF5 mRNA,Bcl-2 mRNA in treatment group were 0. 43 ± 0. 07,0. 33 ± 0. 04,had significant difference with 1. 52 ±0. 09,0. 78 ± 0. 10 in control group( P 〈 0. 05). The total effective rate in treatment group was 87. 50%( 35 /40),had significant difference with 60. 00%( 24 /40) in control group( P 〈 0. 05). The survival rates of three years in treatment group were 87. 50%( 35 /40),72. 50%( 29 /40),42. 50%( 17 /40),had significant difference with 50. 00%( 20 /40),32. 50%( 13 /40),7. 50%( 3 /40) in control group( P 〈 0. 05). Adverse drug reactions mainly manifested as neutropenia,hand- foot syndrome,nausea and vomiting reaction. The total incidence of adverse reactions in treatment group was 15. 00%( 6 /40),had significant difference with 72. 50%( 29 /40) in control group( P 〈 0. 05).Conclusion Due to the pathological characteristics of differentiated colorectal cancer,different treatment methods should be adopted to achieve the most effective treatment.
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第18期1666-1669,共4页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
基金 河北省卫生厅基金资助项目(ZL20140038)
关键词 高中分化结直肠腺癌 低分化结直肠腺癌 XELOX化疗 肿瘤 癌细胞 high and moderate-grade colorectal adenocarcinoma low-grade colorectal adenocarcinoma XELOX chemotherapy tumor cancer cell
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献26

  • 1陈智伟,廖美琳,陈玉蓉,赵家美,张心敏,成柏君.WHO标准和RECIST标准评价肺癌化疗疗效的比较[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):83-84. 被引量:33
  • 2Therasse P,Arbuck SG,Eisenhauer EA. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors[ J. Na Cancer Inst,2000, 92(3) :205 -216.
  • 3Sehuller J, Cassidy J, Dumont E, et al. Preferential activation of capecitabine in tumor fallowing oral administration to colorect al cancer patients [ J ]. Cancer Chemather Pharmacol, 2000,45 ( 4 ) 291 - 297.
  • 4Twelves C, Wong A, Nowacki MP,et al. Capecitabine as adjuvant- treatment for stage III colon cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005,35 (26) :2696 - 2704.
  • 5Van Cutsem E,Twelves C,Cassidy J,et al. Oral capecitabine com- paredwith intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase study[ Jl J Clin Oneol, 2001,19 ( 2 ) : 4097 - 4106.
  • 6Cassidy J ,Clarke S,Diaz-Rubio E,et al. Randomized phase ilI study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer[ J ]. J Clin Onco1,2008,26 (5) :2006 - 2012.
  • 7Cassidy J, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, et al. XELOX vs FOLFOX- 4 as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: NO16966 updated results? [J]. Br J Cancer, 2011, 105(1) :58-64.
  • 8Haydon A. Adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer: what is the evidence? [J]. Intern Med J, 2003.33: 119-124.
  • 9Rocha J A. Bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, 5- fluorouracil and leucovorin given as first-line treatment of metastatic eolorectal cancer [J]. Anticancer Drugs, 2011,22 (Suppl 2) : S9-S13.
  • 10Doi T, Boku N, Kato K, et al. Phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ Study of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin (XELOX) Plus Bevacizumab As First-line Therapy in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [ J ]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2010,40 (10) : 913- 920.

共引文献1603

同被引文献36

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部