“经验”或“认知”:学科逻辑与心理逻辑的统一路径研究

"Experience" or "Cognition" :A Study on the Unified Approach to the Subject Logic and Psychological Logic

学科逻辑与心理逻辑是课程组织中一对基本矛盾关系。以往对其关系的探讨多从对立入手,而对其统一问题关涉不足。在教育学历史上,以杜威、克伯屈为代表的进步主义学派和以皮亚杰、布鲁纳为代表的结构主义学派曾对其统一问题进行探索,在学科逻辑与心理逻辑的内涵、二者关系及其统一方式和实践形态等方面均采取不同立场,形成了"经验"与"认知"两种路径。"经验"路径与"认识"路径基于不同认识论基础,服务于不同的育人目标,须根据教育目的来选择和考量;两种路径的交汇点——反思与交互作用可作为探索此问题新的契机。

Subject logic and psychological logic are a pair of basic contradictions re- garding curriculum organization. Existing studies on this issue focus more on the conflict than the unity. In the history of pedagogy, progressivism represented by John Dewey, W.H. Kilpatrick, and structuralism represented by Jean Piaget, Jerome S. Bruner, used to probe into the problem of unification. They took different positions on the meaning, the relation- ship, the unified method and the practical form of subject logic and psychological logic, and developed two approaches： the path of ＂experience＂ and the path of ＂cognition＂. The two approaches root in different Epistemological foundations and serve for different educational goals, so they must be measured according to the purpose of education;the intersection of the two approaches ： reflection and interaction may be a new ground in exploring this issue.