期刊文献+

从舍勒的知识观和教育观看德国的课程统整 被引量:3

Curriculum Integration in Germany from the angle of Scheler's Concept of Knowledge and Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 课程统整是美国新进步主义课程流派的重要观念。与美国不同,部分欧洲大陆国家的课程统整理论和实践受到了德国传统教育哲学的影响。舍勒在继承德国古典哲学的基础上,对知识的等级秩序、教育的本质、教养如何实现等问题进行了系统论述。从舍勒的知识等级秩序观和教化的教育观切入能够更深入地理解德国的课程统整理论和实践。舍勒之后,德国的教学论学者根据教化的教育观发展了德国的课程统整理论,并在课程统整中贯穿教化的教育观。以化学教育为例,教化取向的化学课程通过反思的、批判的、哲学的教学方式来实现化学课程统整。德国与美国的课程统整观念虽然存在差异,但在课程实践中二者殊途同归,最后都落脚到知识、社会与个体经验的意义整合。 Curriculum integration is an important concepts of new progressive course genre in the United States.Unlike the United States, the theory and practice of curriculum integration in some continental Europe countries was influenced by Germany's traditional educational philosophy. On the basis of inheriting the German classical philosophy, Scheler discussed some issues such as the rank order of knowledge, the essence of education and how to realize Bildung. From the view of knowledge hierarchy and Bildung of Scheler, we can understand the theory and practice of curriculum integration in Germany more deeply. After Scheler, scholars who study teaching theory developed curriculum integration theory according to Bildung in Germany. For Example, Bildung-oriented chemistry education through teaching methods of reflection, critique and philosophy to achieve the curriculum integration of chemical. Although the idea of curriculum integration between Germany and the United States is differences, they have same results in the curriculum practice, which integration between knowledge, social and individual experience tinnily.
作者 方华梁
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期83-92,共10页 Studies in Foreign Education
关键词 舍勒 知识观 教育观 课程统整 教化 Scheler concept of knowledge concept of education curriculum integration Bildung
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1詹姆斯·比恩.课程统整[M].单文经,等,译.上海:华东师大出版社,2003:7-23.
  • 2哈贝马斯.论杜威的《确定性的寻求》[M]//杜威.确定性的寻求——关于知行关系的研究.傅统先,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
  • 3杜威.德国的道德哲学和政治哲学[M]//杜威全集·中期著作(1899—1924)(第8卷)(1915).何克勇,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2012:133—135.
  • 4比尔·雷丁斯.废墟中的大学[M].郭军,等,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2008:61.
  • 5舍勒.舍勒选集[M].曹卫东,译.上海:上海三联出版社,1999:1059,1398—1399,1059,1061,1061,1370,1384,1386,1399.
  • 6方华梁.自我塑造:德国现代大学的核心理念——兼与王飞博士商榷及相关问题补充[J].比较教育研究,2015,37(6):91-95. 被引量:4
  • 7V6squez-Levy, D.. Bildung-centredDidaktik: A framework for examining the educational po- tential of subject matter[J]. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2002,34( 1 ) : 117-128.
  • 8Hansen, K. H., Olson, J.. How teachers construe curriculum integration : The science, technolo- gy, society (STS) movement as Bildung [J]. Journal of curriculum studies, 1996,28 (6) : 669-682.
  • 9Hamilton, D..From curriculum to Bildung [R]. The 12th International Standing Conference for the History of Education, Prague, 1990 : 339.
  • 10Menck, P.. Didactics as construction of content [J]. Journal of curriculum studies, 1995,27 (4) : 353-371.

二级参考文献21

  • 1[加]比尔·雷丁斯.废墟中的大学[M],郭军,陈毅平等译.北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
  • 2[德]费希特.伦理学体系[M].北京:商务印书馆,2007.
  • 3[德]费希特.全部知识学的基础[M].北京:商务印书馆,1986.14,13,21,26,48,54,75,75,94.
  • 4[德]费希特.论学者的使命人的使命[M].北京:商务印书晴,2008.
  • 5Brudford,W.H.Culture and Society in Classical Weimar [ M ].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.84-292.
  • 6Wilhelm yon Humboldt.The Limits of State Action [ M ].Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1969.17,19, 28.
  • 7[德]伊曼纽尔·康德.纯粹理性批判[M].韦卓民译.武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2000.35.
  • 8[美]米歇尔·艾伦·吉莱斯皮.现代性的神学起源[M].张卜天译.长沙:湖南科技出版社,2012.341,340.
  • 9[德]费希特.费希特全集[M].第1卷,第262页.
  • 10王玖兴.费希特生平、思想简介[A].[德]费希特.全部知识学的基础[M].王玖兴译.北京:商务印书馆,1986.xi.

共引文献3

同被引文献32

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部