期刊文献+

急性呼吸窘迫综合征的肺保护性通气治疗现状和再认识 被引量:13

Lung protective strategy in acute respiratory distress syndrome: current status and new understanding
原文传递
导出
摘要 肺保护性通气策略一直是近20年来急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的标准治疗。小潮气量通气、相对高呼气末正压通气(PEEP)及限制平台压是肺保护性通气策略的主要构成。依据近年相关临床研究,现回顾并总结肺保护性通气策略的临床现状,提出临床医师在临床中应该采取的最佳通气策略。同时结合应力与应变从理论探讨呼吸机相关性肺损伤的机制和对肺保护性通气策略的再认识。 For the last 20 years,lung protective strategy which comprises of low tidal volume, higher positive end expiratory pressure, and limited plateau pressure has become a standard care for acute respiratory distress syndrome ( ARDS), but still do not know the best way to ventilate patients with ARDS. This article reviews clinical trials related to lung protective strategy published in recent years and give some suggestions in optimal mechanical ventilation. In ad- dition, the article also introduces some concept of ventilator related lung injury and new understanding in lung protective strategy using stress and strain theory.
作者 喻文亮
出处 《中华实用儿科临床杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第18期1381-1383,共3页 Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
关键词 急性呼吸窘迫综合征 肺保护性通气策略 应力 应变 Acute respiratory distress syndrome Lung protective strategy Stress Strain
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1SteinbergKP, HudsonLD, GoodmanRB, et al.Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome[J].N Engl J Med, 2006, 354(16):1671-1684.
  • 2AmatoMB, BarbasCS, MedeirosDM, et al.Effect of a protective–ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome[J].N Engl J Med, 1998, 338(6):347-354.DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380602.
  • 3National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, WiedemannHP, WheelerAP, et al.Comparison of two fluid–management strategies in acute lung injury[J].N Engl J Med, 2006, 354(24):2564-2575.DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa062200.
  • 4CornfieldDN.Acute respiratory distress syndrome in children:physiology and management[J].Curr Opin Pediatr, 2013, 25(3):338-343.DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e328360bbe7.
  • 5NeedhamDM, YangT, DinglasVD, et al.Timing of low tidal volume ventilation and intensive care unit mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome.A prospective cohort study[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2015, 191(2):177-185.DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201409-1598OC.
  • 6AmatoMB, MeadeMO, SlutskyAS, et al.Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome[J].N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(8):747-755.DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639.
  • 7BrowerRG, MorrisA, MacIntyreN, et al.Effects of recruitment maneuvers in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with high positive end–expiratory pressure[J].Crit Care Med, 2003, 31(11):2592-2597.
  • 8HaitsmaJJ, LachmannRA, LachmannB.Open lung in ARDS[J].Acta Pharmacol Sin, 2003, 24(12):1304-1307.
  • 9TalmorD, SargeT, MalhotraA, et al.Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury[J].N Engl J Med, 2008, 359(20):2095-2104.DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708638.
  • 10BrowerRG, LankenPN, MacintyreN, et al.Higher versus lower positive end–expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome[J].N Engl J Med, 2004, 351(4):327-336.DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032193.

同被引文献95

引证文献13

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部