期刊文献+

脑脓肿不同时期手术干预的疗效分析 被引量:5

Analysis of curative effects of surgical interventions in different formation periods on brain abscess
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨脑脓肿不同时期手术方法及其疗效。方法 回顾性分析2010年1月-2015年12月收治的52例脑脓肿的临床资料,依据病理分期及手术方式分为4组:化脓期引流术组14例,化脓期切除术组13例,脓肿形成期引流术组10例,脓肿形成期切除术组15例。术后随访60 d,分析各组疗效、病死率、复发率及术后住院天数、神经症状缓解时间。结果 4组性别比、年龄分布、入院GCS评分无明显差异(P〉0.05)。脓肿形成期切除术组中位住院天数较脓肿形成期引流术组明显延长(P〈0.05),而与化脓期引流术组、化脓期切除术组均无明显差异(P〉0.05)。化脓期引流术组病死率明显高于其他3组(P〈0.05)。4组术后复发率均无明显差异(P〉0.05)。脓肿形成期切除术组中位神经症状缓解时间最短(P〈0.05)。结论 脓肿形成期引流术后住院天数较长,但神经症状缓解较快;化脓期出现脑疝征象时,应积极手术干预,必要时行去骨瓣减压术。 Objective To explore the effects of different surgical intervention in different period on brain abscess. Methods The clinical data of 54 patients with brain abscess treated in our hospital from January, 2010 to December, 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the pathological stage and operation method, 54 patients were divided into four groups. Of 27 patients in maturating period, 14 underwent drainage of the abscess (group A) and 13 excision of the abscess (group B). Of 25 patients in the maturated period, 7 underwent drainage of the abscess (group C) and 18 excision (group D). The curative effect and postoperative hospital stays were compared among all the groups. Results There were insignificant differences in the male vs female ratio, ages and GCS score on admission to hospital among all the groups (P〉0.05). The median hospital stays after the operation were significantly shorter in group D than group C (P〈0.05). Three patients (20.0%, 3/15) died in group D. No patients died in the other groups. The death rate was significantly higher in group D than those in the other groups (P〈0.05). Conclusions The curative effects of different surgery interventions in different periods of brain abscess formation on brain abscess are different from each other.
出处 《中国临床神经外科杂志》 2016年第9期523-526,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery
基金 新疆维吾尔自治区青年科技人才专项科研项目(2015Y35)
关键词 脑脓肿 脓肿引流术 脓肿切除术 预后 Brain abscess Different formation period Drainage Excision Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1郑峥,宿英英.脑脓肿治疗研究进展[J].中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志,2006,13(1):60-63. 被引量:19
  • 2于新,刘锐,张剑宁,赵虎林,王亚明,亓树彬,王洪伟,杜亚楠,贾博.多房性脑脓肿的临床特点与治疗选择[J].中华神经医学杂志,2012,11(12):1263-1266. 被引量:11
  • 3岑波,陈红兵,胡飞,王建一,谭安娜.术中超声引导下显微外科手术治疗脑脓肿[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2012,17(9):557-558. 被引量:7
  • 4Sarmast AH, Showkat HI, Kirmani AR, et al. Aspiration ver- sus excision: single centerexperienceof forty-seven patients with brain abscess over 10 years [J]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2012, 52(10): 724-730.
  • 5Arlotti M, Grossi P, Pea F, et al. Consensus document on controversial issues for the treatment of infections of the central nervous system: bacterial brain abscesses [J]. Int J Infect Dis, 2010, 14 Suppl 4: S79-92.
  • 6Muzumdar D, Jhawar S, Goel A. Brain abscess: an overview [J]. Int J Surg, 2011, 9(2): 136-44.
  • 7Landriel F, Ajler P, Hem S, et al. Supratentorial and infra- tentorial brain abscesses: surgical treatment, complications andoutcomes—a 10-year single-center study [J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2012, 154(5): 903-911.
  • 8袁邦清,傅芬兰,黄绍宽,林川淦,苏同刚.立体定向穿刺引流术治疗脑脓肿失败原因探析[J].立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志,2013,26(4):220-222. 被引量:3
  • 9Nathoo N, Nadvi SS, Narotam PK, et al. Brain abscess: management and outcome analysis of a computed tomogra- phyera experience with 973 patients [J]. World Neurosurg, 2011,75(5-6): 716-726.
  • 10Ratnaike TE, Das S, Gregson BA, et al. A review of brain abscess surgical treatment—78 years: aspiration versus excision [J]. World Neurosurg, 2011, 76(5): 431-436.

二级参考文献39

  • 1何生玲,秦坤明.脑脓肿45例临床分析[J].广西医科大学学报,2003,20(4):594-595. 被引量:5
  • 2周大彪,赵继宗,王硕,倪明,王嵘,张东,赵元立.术中实时超声在脑动静脉畸形外科治疗中的应用[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(24):1688-1691. 被引量:25
  • 3郑峥,宿英英.脑脓肿治疗研究进展[J].中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志,2006,13(1):60-63. 被引量:19
  • 4于新,黄敏华,田增民,李士月,郭勇,郑奎宏.脑脓肿的MRI诊断和立体定向手术治疗[J].立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志,2007,20(1):28-31. 被引量:9
  • 5曾力 张友东.脑脓肿112例回顾性研究[J].临床神经外科学杂志,2002,4(3):113-113.
  • 6Fere C, Ariza J, Viladrich PF, et al. Brain abscess rupturing into the ventricles or subarachnoid space [J]. Am J M, 1999,106(2) :254-257.
  • 7Rousseaux M, Lrsoin F, Destee A, et al. Developments in the treament and prognosis of multiple cerebral abscesses[J]. Neurosurgery, 1985,16:304.
  • 8Zeidman SM. Pyogenic brain abscess[M]. In: Osenbach RK, Zendman SM. Infections in Neurological Surgery[M]. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven publisher, 1999. 101-118.
  • 9Takeshita M, Kawamata T, Lzawa M, etal. Prodromal signs and clinical factors influencing outcome in patients with intraventicular rupture of purulent brain abscess[J]. Neurosurgery, 2001, 48(2):310-317.
  • 10Takeshita M, Kagawa M, Lzawa M, et al. Current treatment strategies and factors influencing outcome in patients with bacterial brain abseess[J]. Aeta Neuroehir (Wien) ,1998, 140(12):1263-1270.

共引文献35

同被引文献12

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部