期刊文献+

三维人体扫描系统在慢性皮肤溃疡面积测量中的应用 被引量:3

Application of Burn Calc 3D Body Scanning System in Measurement of the Area of Chronic Skin Ulcers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究Burn Calc扫描系统在慢性皮肤溃疡创面测量中的效果。方法选取2014年6月-2014年12月于我院就诊的皮肤慢性溃疡患者30例,分别采用无菌薄膜勾边法、NIH Image J方法和Burn Calc扫描方法对患者创面进行测量,使用统计学方法分析3种检测方法测量结果的一致性。结果随机区组方差分析显示3种方法测得创面面积无统计学差异(F=2.57,P=0.085);独立t检验分析B法与A法创面面积差值,无统计学差异(t=-0.728,P=0.472);独立t检验分析C法与A法创面面积差值,无统计学差异(t=2.010,P=0.054)。结论 Burn Calc扫描系统可以精确测量慢性皮肤溃疡创面面积,可作为临床评估慢性皮肤溃疡创面的新方法。 Objective To study the effectiveness of application of Burn Calc 3D body scanning system in measurement of the wound areas of chronic skin ulcers. Methods Altogether 30 cases of chronic skin ulcer patients who were treated in Changhai Hospital from June 2014 to December 2014 was involved in this study. Their wounds were measured by using the transparency tracing method(Method A), NIH Image J method(Method B) and Burn Calc scanning method(Method C) respectively. The statistical approach was applied to analyze the consistency among the results acquired by using three methods. Results According to the randomized block analysis of variance, no statistically significant difference was found among wound areas acquired by using three measurement methods(F=2.569, P=0.085). The results of independent t-test analysis showed that the difference between wound areas acquired by using Method B, Method A and Method C, Method A had no statistical significance respectively [(t=-0.728, P=0.472),(t=2.010, P=0.054)]. Conclusion The Burn Calc 3D body scanning system proved its effectiveness in accurate measurement of the wound areas of chronic skin ulcers, which could be considered a new method for the clinical evaluation of wound areas of chronic skin ulcers.
出处 《中国医疗设备》 2016年第9期46-49,共4页 China Medical Devices
基金 国家自然科学基金(81372057)
关键词 三维扫描 无菌薄膜勾法 数码相机法 慢性溃疡面积测量 three-dimensional scanning transparency tracing method NIH Image J method chronic ulcer area measurement
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Oyibo SO,Jude EB,Tarawneh I,et al.The effects of ulcer size and site, patient's age,sex and type and duration of diabetes on the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers[J].Diabet Med,2001,18(2): 133-138.
  • 2Sheehan P, Jones P, Caselli A,et al.Percent change in wound area of diabetic foot ulcers over a 4-week period is a robust predictor of complete healing in a 12-week prospective trial[J].D/abetes Czme,2(133,26(6): 1879-1882.
  • 3Ince P, Kendrick D,Game F, et al.The association between baseline characteristics and the outcome of foot lesions in a UK population with diabetes[J].Diabet Med,2007,24(9):977-981.
  • 4Langemo D,Hanson D.Sizing up wounds accurately[J].Nursing, 2005,35(4):70-71.
  • 5Langemo D,Hanson D.Sizing your patient's wounds[J].LPN, 2007,3(1):29-30.
  • 6Rogers LC,Bevilacqua NJ,Armstrong DG,et al.Digital planimetry results in more accurate wound measurements:a comparison to standard ruler measurements[J].J Diabetes Sci Technol,2010,4( 4 ): 799-802.
  • 7Goldman RJ,Salcido R.More than one way to measure a wound: an overview of tools and techniques[J].Adv Skin Wound Care,2002,15(5):236-243.
  • 8Georgina G,Seamus C.Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry[J].J Clin Nuts,2006,15(4):422-427.
  • 9Davis KE,Constantine FC,Macaslan EC,et al.Validation of a laser-assisted wound measurement device for measuring wound volume[J].JDiabetes Sci Technol,2013,7(5): 1161 - 1166.
  • 10Flanagan M.Improving accuracy of wound measurement in clinical practice[J].Ostomy Wound Manage,2003,49(10):28-40.

二级参考文献34

  • 1Maklebust J.Pressure ulcer assessment[J].Clin Geriatr Med,1997,13:455-481.
  • 2Resch CS,Kerner E,Robson MC,et al.Pressure sore volume measurement.A technique to document and record wound healing[J].J Am Geriatr Soc,1988,36:444-446.Comment in:J Am Geriatr soc,1989,37(3):288-289.
  • 3Barboriak DP,Padua AO,York GE,et al.Creation of DICOM-aware applications using image J[J].J Digit Imaging,2005,18(2):91-99.
  • 4Goldman R J,Salcido R.More than one way to measure a wound:an overview of tools and techniques[J].Adv Skin Wound Care,2002,15(5):236-243.
  • 5Langemo DK,Melland H,Olson B,et al.Comparison of 2 wound volume measurement methods[J].Adv Skin Wound Care,2001,14:190-196.
  • 6Berg B,Traneroth C.A method for measuring pressure sores[J].Lancet,1990,335:1445-1446.
  • 7Joseph E,Hamori C,Bergman S,et al.A prospective randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure versus standard therapy of chronic nonhealing wounds[J].Wounds,2000,12(3):60-67.
  • 8Cutler N,George R,Seifert RD,et al.Comparison of quantitative methodologies to define chronic pressure ulcer measurements[J].Decubitus,1993,6(6):22-30.
  • 9Resch C,Kerner E,Robson MC,et al.Pressure sore volume measurement.A technique to document and record wound healing[J].J Am Geriatr Soc,1988,36:444-446.
  • 10Bryant RA.Acute and chronic wounds:Nursing management[M].2nd ed.St.Louis,MO:Mosby Year Book,1992.

共引文献80

同被引文献38

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部