期刊文献+

磺脲类药物用于2型糖尿病患者的心血管安全性评价 被引量:5

Evaluation on Cardiovascular Safety of Sulfonylureas for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 磺脲类(sulfonylureas,SUs)药物治疗2型糖尿病已有逾50年历史。自1970年University Group Diabetes Program试验发表以来,有关S U s的心血管安全性一直备受争议。尽管存在一些S U s致心血管不良反应的假说,但无一可提供可靠的证据。目前,某些观察性研究提示,SUs与心血管事件发生风险增加有关,但随机对照试验却得出了相悖结论。在评价SUs心血管安全性时,需根据具体药物、使用剂量和疗程、患者的年龄、体质指数等因素综合考虑。迄今,尚缺乏旨在探索SUs心血管结局的头对头研究数据,但正在进行的大型临床试验有望阐明SUs和心血管疾病的发生是否存在因果关系。 Sulfonylureas have been used for type 2 diabetes treatment over 50 years. Since publication of the University Group Diabetes Program in 1970, the cardiovascular safety of sulfonylureas has been contentious. Although several hypotheses linking sulfonylurea to detrimental cardiovascular events exist, none provide conclusive evidence. Presently, several observational studies suggest that sulfonylureas are associated with increased adverse cardiovascular outcome; however, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated a neutral effect. Evaluating cardiovascular safety of sulfonylureas should be based on comprehensive consideration, such as differential drugs, doses, durations, age of patient, body mass index. To date, there is lack of head-to-head study, which is focused on cardiovascular outcome of sulfonylureas. Fortunately, the current ongoing large clinical trials may clarify the cardiovascular safety of sulfonylureas.
作者 张舫 童南伟
出处 《药品评价》 CAS 2016年第5期31-36,共6页 Drug Evaluation
关键词 磺脲类 糖尿病 2型 心血管安全性 Sulfonylureas Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Cardiovascular Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Azim S, Baker WL, White WB. Evaluating cardiovascular safety of novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. Curr Cardiol Rep, 2014, 16(11): 541.
  • 2van Dieren S, Beulens JW, van der Schouw YT, et al. The global burden of diabetes and its complications: an emerging pandemic[J]. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil, 2010, 17(Suppl 1): $3-8.
  • 3Meinert CL, Knatterud GL, Prout TE, et al. A study of the effects of hypoglycemic agents on vascular complications in patients with adult-onset diabetes. II. Mortality results[J]. Diabetes, 1970, 19(Suppl. ): 789-830.
  • 4UK Prospective Diabetes Study(UKPDS)Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes(UKPDS 33)[J]. Lancet, 1998, 352: 837-853.
  • 5Halkin A, Roth A, Jonas M, et al. Sulfonylureas are not associated with increased mortality in diabetics treated with thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction[J]. J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2001, 12: 177-184.
  • 6Jollis JG, Simpson RJ Jr, Cascio WE, et al. Relation between sulfonylurea therapy, complications, and outcome for elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Am Heart J, 1999, 138: $376-380.
  • 7Sola D, Rossi L, Schianca GP, et al. Sulfonylureas and their use in clinical practice[J]. Arch Med Sci, 2015, 11 (4): 840-848.
  • 8Abdelmoneim AS, Eurich DT, Light PE, et al. Cardiovascular safety of sulphonylureas: over 40years of continuous controversy without an answer[J]. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2015, 17(6): 523-532.
  • 9Nichols CG, Singh GK, Grange DK. KATP channels and cardiovascular disease: suddenly a syndrome[J]. Circ Res, 2013, 112: 1059-1072.
  • 10Quayle JM, Nelson MT, Standen NB. ATP-sensitive and inwardly rectifying potassium channels in smooth muscle[J]. Physiol Rev, 1997, 77: 1165- 1232.

同被引文献39

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部