摘要
目的:观察尿石症患者在使用山莨菪碱时出现的不良反应,并总结临床护理措施。方法:择取2014年4月到2016年4月期间于笔者所在江西省南昌市第三医院治疗尿石症的60例患者,按照临床采用的不同护理治疗方法进行分组:采用硫酸镁+常规护理的30例患者归入对照组,采用山莨菪碱+综合护理的30例患者归入研究组。组间对比两组患者的不良发应率、护理总有效率等指标。结果:研究组不良反应率(20%)低于对照组(50%),护理总有效率(90%)高于对照组(66.67%),统计学有差异(P<0.05)。结论:山莨菪碱有一定的不良反应,临床为尿石症患者应用时可通过综合护理进行预防和缓解。
Objective： To observe the adverse reactions of urolithiasis patients in the use ofanisodamine, and summarize the clinical nursing measures. Methods： 60 urolithiasis patients from April 2014 to April 2016 in Jiangxi Third Hospital of Nanchang were divided into two groups： the magnesium sulfate ＋ conventional treatment group （control group, 30 cases）, the anisodamine and comprehensive treatment group （study group, 30 cases）. The adverse rate and the total effective rate of the patients in the two groups were compared between the two groups. Results： The adverse reaction rate of the study group （20%） was lower than that of the control group （50%）; the total effective rate （90%） was higher than that of the control group （66.67%）; and the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： Anisodamine has certain side effects, and comprehensive nursing care could help to ameliorate the symptoms.
出处
《药品评价》
CAS
2016年第13期37-40,共4页
Drug Evaluation
