摘要
"反右"以后,《星星》诗刊丧失初创期的异议风格,然而在有关"新诗的道路"的论争中仍然为文学坚持了不能后撤的底线。事情起源于"文艺大跃进"形势下"群众"读者对于新诗的质疑与挑战。期间,立场纷异的读者、评论家、诗人和政府官员悉数卷入,而新诗作为被守护或被排斥的知识对象,经受了阶级论述、民族主义论述、现代化论述的反复争夺。最后新诗勉强站住"阵脚"。而论争清晰折射了当代文学内在的矛盾与危机。
After the Anti-rightist Movement, Journal of Star erased its dissenting features which used to be characteristic of its early stage. However, it insisted on literary qualities as the bottom line of poetry, in spite of suspects and challenges from ＂mass＂ readers under the influence of＂Great Leap of Literature ＆ Arts＂. Numerous readers, critics, poets and officials were fully involved in arguments and debates. Finally, as knowledge object defended or expelled, new poetry held its domain in spite of waves of fighting discourses of class, nationalism, modernization. The debates which lasted more than one year clearly reflected conflicts and crisis within contemporary literature.
出处
《长江学术》
2016年第3期66-74,共9页
Yangtze River Academic
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"十七年文学杂志与文学生产"(10YJC751118)
