期刊文献+

早期应用替罗非班对急性冠脉综合征择期冠脉介入治疗心肌微循环灌注及左心室功能的影响 被引量:10

Effects of Tirofiban on Myocardium Ischemia-reperfusion and Left Ventricular Function of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Delayed Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨早期应用血小板膜糖蛋白(GP)Ⅱb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂替罗非班对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者行择期冠状动介入治疗(择期PCI)时心肌微循环灌注及左心室功能的影响,了解替罗非班早期应用是否可以改善ACS患者择期PCI术前术后心肌微循环灌注和后期左心室功能,从而改善ACS临床预后。方法选择2013年1月至2015年1月我院心内科住院治疗的非急诊PCI ACS患者150例,采用简单随机抽样法将其平均分为观察组75例(替罗非班+标准药物治疗)和对照组75例(标准药物治疗),1周后均行冠状动脉造影及PCI治疗。比较两组患者冠脉造影TIMI血流水平分级、PCI术后校正的TIMI血流帧数(CTFC)、PCI术前和术后1、3、6个月左心室功能指标[血浆NT pro BNP、左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、左室收缩末期内径(LVESD)]以及出血并发症发生率。结果两组患者冠脉造影病变血管(IRA)TIMI血流水平分级差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而PCI术后替罗非班组IRA CTFC明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);术前、术后1个月左心功能指标BNP、LVEF、LVEDD、LVESD两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而术后3、6个月左心功能各项指标替罗非班组明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察两组术前术中术后出血并发症发生率,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论急性冠脉综合征患者早期应用替罗非班可以明显改善择期PCI术后心肌微循环灌注,改善后期左心室功能,而出血并发症发生率无明显增加,从而为失去急诊血运重建的ACS患者寻找一条新的改善预后的治疗方法,为临床应用提供参考价值。 Objective To explore the effects of platelet membrane glycoprotein GPllb/llla receptor antagonists tirofiban on myocardium ischemia-reperfusion and left ventricular function of patients with acute coronary syndromes( ACS) undergoing delayednbsp;percutaneous coronary intervention( delayed PCI) ,and to find out whether early administration of tirofiban in patients with ACS can improve myocardium ischemia – reperfusion before and after delayed PCI and left ventricular function at late stage and the prognosis of ACS. Methods 150 non-emergency hospitalized patients with ACS treated in our department of cardiology were selected and simply randomized into observation group(tirofiban plus routine therapy,n=75)and control group(routine therapy only,n=75). All patients were given coronary artery angiograph and PCI after one week. The degree of TIMI flow,corrected TIMI frame count( CTFC) after PCI,left ventricular function indexes( NT pro BNP,LVEF,LVEDD,LVESD) and the incidence of bleeding complications examined before and 1,3,6,and 12 months after delayed PCI were compared and analyzed. Results The difference in the degree of TIMI flow of infarct-related artery(IRA)between two groups was not statistically significant(P〉0. 05). CTFC of IRA after delayed PCI in the tirofiban therapy group was significantly lower than that in control group(P〈0. 01). The difference in left ventricular function indexes (NT pro BNP,LVEF,LVEDD,LVESD)was also not statistically significant before and 1 months after delayed PCI(P〉0. 05). Left ventricular function indexes in the tirofiban therapy group were significantly better than those in the control group 3 and 6 months after delayed PCI(P〈0. 01). And the difference in the incidence of bleeding complications of two groups was not statistically significant (P〉0. 05). Conclusions Early administration of tirofiban in patients with ACS undergoing delayed PCI improves myocardial reper-fusion and the prognosis of left ventricular function,without significant increase of the incidence of bleeding complications. Thus it helps patients with ACS who missed emergency revascularization to find a new treatment to improve the prognosis and provides reference for clinical application.
出处 《四川医学》 CAS 2016年第10期1152-1156,共5页 Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词 急性冠脉综合征 盐酸替罗非班 心功能 冠状动脉介入治疗 心肌微循环 acute coronary syndrome tirofiban left ventricular function percutaneous coronary intervention myocardial reperfusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献32

  • 1王静,罗萍,王霞,王建宁,万伟英,颜琼,方小芸,杨倩.应用TRBand止血阀对桡动脉穿刺点进行压迫止血的护理观察[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(7):648-649. 被引量:51
  • 2唐强,郭来敬,张树和,王智,曲华清,颜东,唐群中,史震涛.盐酸替罗非班在ST段抬高急性心肌梗死急诊PCI中的安全性分析[J].心肺血管病杂志,2007,26(1):21-23. 被引量:27
  • 3黄照河,侯玉清,贾满盈,黄铮.盐酸替罗非班对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者急诊冠状动脉介入术心肌灌注的影响[J].临床心血管病杂志,2007,23(2):106-108. 被引量:15
  • 4[1]Stone GW,Brodie BR,Griffin JJ,et al.Prospective,multicenter study of the safety and feasibility of primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction:in-hospital and 30-day results of the PAMI stent pilot trial[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1998,31:23-30.
  • 5[2]Ross AM,Neuhaus KL,Ellis SG.Frequent lack of concordance among core laboratories in assessing TIMI flow grade after reperfusion therapy[J].Circulation,1995,92:345.
  • 6[3]Gibson CM,Cannon CP,Daley WL,et al.TIMI frame count:a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow[J].Circulation,1996,93:879-888.
  • 7[4]Appleby MA,Michaels AD,Chen M et al.Importance of the TIMI frame count:implications for future trials[J].Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med,2000,1(1):31-34.
  • 8[5]French JK,Ellis CJ,Webber BJ et al.Abnormal coronary flow in infarct arteries 1 year after myocardial infarction is predicted at 4 weeks by corrected Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count and stenosis severity[J].Am J Cardiol,1998,81:665-671.
  • 9[6]Stankovic G,Manginas A,Voudris V et al.Prediction of restenosis after coronary angioplasty by use of a new index:TIMI frame count/minimal luminal diameter ratio[J].Circulation,2000,101(9):962-968.
  • 10[7]Dodge JT,Rizzo M,Nykiel M,et al.Impact of injection rate on the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial frame count[J].Am J Cardiol,1998,81:1268-1270.

共引文献37

同被引文献80

引证文献10

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部