期刊文献+

标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤的临床分析 被引量:9

Clinical Analysis of Standard Large Trauma Craniotomy for Treating Severe Brain Injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探析标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤的临床效果。方法方便选取该院2001年1月—2005年12月收治的45例重型颅脑损伤患者,随机分为治疗组(23例)和对照组(22例),治疗组采取标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术治疗,对照组采取常规骨瓣开颅术治疗,比较两组疗效及神经功能缺损评分。结果治疗组良好率47.83%、存活率78.26%、并发症发生率17.39%与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组神经功能缺损评分(12.68±5.23)分与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤的临床效果确切,优于常规骨瓣开颅术,值得推广。 Objective Analysis of standard large trauma craniotomy for treating severe brain injury clinical results. Methods Convenient selection our hospital in January 2001—December 2005 were treated 45 cases of severe traumatic brain injury were randomly divided into treatment group(23 cases) and control group(22 cases), the treatment group received standard large trauma craniotomy treatment, the control group received conventional craniotomy treatment, two groups were compared and neurological function. Results Good rate of 47.83% in treatment group, the survival rate of 78.26%, 17.39%complication rate difference compared with the control group(P <0.05); treatment group, neurological deficit scores(12.68±5.23) points difference compared with the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Standard large trauma craniotomy for treating severe brain injury clinical exact effect, superior to conventional craniotomy, worthy of promotion.
作者 袁新春 董伟
出处 《中外医疗》 2016年第28期53-54,57,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术 重型颅脑损伤 临床效果 Standard large trauma craniotomy Severe brain injury Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献63

  • 1刘伟国,冯军峰,杨小锋,沈宏,郑学胜,潘德生,姚瑜.大骨瓣减压治疗重型颅脑损伤疗效分析[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2005,14(12):1016-1018. 被引量:18
  • 2张英波,龙振海.重度颅脑损伤脑疝的治疗分析(附52例报告)[J].中国医师杂志,2006,8(5):677-677. 被引量:3
  • 3刘林林,景文记,梁建荣,程宇宏.颅内血肿脑疝期136例治疗分析[J].中华神经外科杂志,1997,13(3):182-182. 被引量:37
  • 4江基尧.介绍一种美国临床常用的标准外伤大骨瓣术.中华神经外科杂志,1998,.
  • 5王忠,苏宁,吴日乐,等.应用标准外伤大骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑损伤198例分析[c].中国医师协会神经外科医师分会第六届全国代表大会论文集,2011:249-250.
  • 6Kim MH,HwangJW.Jeon YT.et al. Effects of valproic acid and magnesium sulphate on rocuronium requirement in patients undergoing craniotomy for cerebrovascular surgery[J]. BrJ Anaesth,2012, 109(3) :407-412.
  • 7Tan C. Ries CR. Mayson K. et al. Indication for surgery and the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting after craniotomy: a case-control study[J].J Neurosurg Anesthesiol,2012,24(4) :325-330.
  • 8Sacko 0, Lauwers-Cances V, Brauge D, et al. A wake cra?niotomy vs surgery under general anesthesia for resection of supratentorial lesions[J]. Neurosurgery, 2011 , 68 (5) : 1192-1199.
  • 9Nagasaka T, Tsugeno M, Ikeda H, et al. Early recovery and better evacuation rate in neuroendoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using a multifunc?tional cannula: preliminary study in comparison with era?niotomy[J].J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2011,20 (3) : 208- 213.
  • 10Rhondali O,Genty Cv Halle C,et al. Do patients still re- quire admission to an intensive care unit after elective cra?niotomy for brain surgery[J].J Neurosurg Anesthesiol , 2011,23(2):118-123.

共引文献144

同被引文献54

引证文献9

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部