期刊文献+

两种内固定方法治疗老年股骨转子间骨折效果比较 被引量:1

INTERNAL FIXATION IN THE TREATMENT OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES IN THE ELDERLY:COMPARISON OF TWO KINDS OF INTERNAL FIXATION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较两种不同内固定方法治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的效果。方法回顾分析2007年1月—2014年12月我院手术治疗的老年股骨转子间骨折病人97例,其中采用动力髋螺钉(DHS)固定37例(DHS组),股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)固定60例(PFN组)。比较两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后开始下床活动时间、术后髋关节功能Harris评分及治疗效果。结果 DHS组和PFN组的术中出血量分别为(400±100)、(150±50)mL,手术时间分别为(110±20)、(75±20)min,术后开始下床活动时间分别为(90±15)、(35±5)d,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(t=8.372~21.577,P〈0.01)。两组病人术后3、6、12个月时的Harris评分差异有显著性(t=5.145~10.841,P〈0.05)。随访12~24个月,DHS组、PFN组的优良率分别为70.27%、90.00%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.612,P〈0.05)。结论两种内固定方法均为治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的有效方法,PFN手术具有创伤小、失血量少、下床早等优点,疗效优于DHS,适用于各种类型的转子间骨折。 Objective To compare the efficacy of two kinds of internal fixation for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Methods A retrospective analysis was done in 97 elderly with intertrochanteric fractures treated in our hospital during January 2007-December 2014.Of the 97 patients,37underwent dynamic hip screw(DHS),and 60 received proximal femoral nail(PFN).Operation time,blood loss at surgery,time of post-operative out-of-bed activity,post-operative Harris score of hip function and the effectiveness were compared between the two methods. Results In the DHS group and PFN group,blood loss was(400±100)mL in DPS and(150±50)mL in PFN,operation time was(110±20)min versus(75±20)min,the time of out-ofbed activity was(90±15)days versus(35±5)days.The differences in the above items between the two methods were significant(t=8.372-21.577,P〈0.01).The difference in Harris score between the two groups,after 3,6and 12 months after operation,was statistically significant(t=5.145-10.841,P〈0.05).A follow-up of 12-24 months showed the excellent rates in DHS and PFN groups were 70.27% and 90.00%,respectively(χ2=9.612,P〈0.05). Conclusion The two internal fixation methodsdynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail-are both effective for seniors with intertrochanteric fractures,but the latter is superior to the former on the following items:minimally invasive,less blood loss,and early out-of-bed activity,which is suitable for various types of intertrochanteric fractures.
出处 《青岛大学医学院学报》 CAS 2016年第4期455-457,共3页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Qingdao Universitatis
关键词 股骨颈骨折 老年人 骨折固定术 治疗结果 femoral neck fractures aged fracture fixation internal treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献56

  • 1李宇祎.“牟合方盖”研究[J].雁北师范学院学报,2003,19(5):107-108. 被引量:5
  • 2陈晋杰,潘少川,张连柱,董瑞安,孟令文,杨珮荪,刘国贞,柳海峰.“三花接骨散”治疗骨折的试验性报告[J].北京医学,1995,17(1):58-61. 被引量:10
  • 3Cooper C, Campion G, Melton I41 3rd. Hip fractures in the elder- ly: a world-wide projeetion. Osteoporos Int, 1992, 2(6): 285-289.
  • 4Petsatodis G, Maliogas G, Karikis J, et al. External fixation for stable and unstable intertrochauteric fractures in patients older than 75 years of age: a prospective comparative study. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25(4): 218-223.
  • 5Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM. Intramedullary ver- sus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrechanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998(348): 87-94.
  • 6Ahn J, Bernstein J. Fractures in brief: intertrochanteric hip frac- tures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(5): 1450-1452.
  • 7Zhang CQ, Sun Y, Jin DX, et al. Reverse LISS plating for in- tertrochanteric hip fractures in elderly patients. BMC Muscu- loskelet Disord, 2010, 11: 166.
  • 8Dall"Oca C, Maluta T, Moscolo A, et al. Cement augmentation of intertrochanteric fractures stabilised with intramedullary nailing. Injury, 2010, 41(11): 1150-1155.
  • 9Kokoroghiannis C, Aktselis I, Deligeorgis A, et al. Evolving con- cepts of stability and intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fraetures-A review. Injury, 2011 Jul 11. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 10Haidukewych GJ. Intertrochanteric fractures: ten tips to improve results. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009, 91(3): 712-719.

共引文献353

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部