期刊文献+

无线食管pH胶囊在咽喉反流诊断中的价值 被引量:1

The value of wireless pH capsule monitoring in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨无线食管pH胶囊在咽喉反流诊断中的应用价值,以及胃食管反流病与咽喉反流的相关性。方法对12例有咽喉反流症状、咽喉反流症状指数量表(RSI)大于13分的的患者(LPR组)及12例健康志愿者(对照组),行咽喉反流症状指数量表(RSI)评分,再进行食管双pH胶囊监测48 h。监测期间记录饮食、睡眠、活动、服药等情况及不适症状,比较两组食管上下段反流的监测情况,并对胃食管反流指标及咽喉反流指标进行相关性分析。结果 LPR组pH胶囊监测检出的平均咽喉反流次数、食管下段的DeMeester评分(DMS)高于对照组,与RSI评分相符,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。LPR组咽喉反流次数与DMS显著相关。监测过程中未出现严重的不良反应。结论无线食管pH胶囊可用于咽喉反流的pH监测及诊断,有良好的准确性、耐受性、安全性。 Objective To investigate the correlation between gastroesophageal reflux and laryngopharyngeal reflux( LPR) and the clincal value of wireless pH capsule monitoring in the diagnosis of LPR. Methods Tweleve patients with LPR symptoms who scored more than 13 in reflux symptoms index ( RSI) test and tweleve healthy volunteers were recruited. They were required to receive RSI test and 48-hour dual wireless pH monitoring. The details of meals, sleep, activities, and discomfort were recorded. The acid exposure and the correlation of proximal and distal esophageal were analyzed. Results The LPR episodes and DMS in LPR patients were significantly higher than that in healthy volunteer group ( P 〈0. 05 ) , in coincidence with the RSI scores. The LPR episodes were correlated with DMS in LPR patients significantly. There were not any severe side effects during monitoring. Conclusion Wireless pH capsule is effective in pH monitoring in laryngopharyngeal reflux with high accuracy,safety and tolerance.
出处 《中华胃食管反流病电子杂志》 2015年第4期197-201,共5页 Chinese Journal Of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition)
基金 南京军区医学科技创新重点项目(12Z35) 福建省科技计划重点项目(2014l0005)
关键词 咽喉反流 食管pH胶囊 Laryngopharyngeal reflux Wireless pH capsule
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献85

  • 1Andrés de Hoyos,Edgar Alain Esparza.Technical problems produced by the Bravo pH test in nonerosive reflux disease patients[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(25):3183-3186. 被引量:2
  • 2王行炜.600例难治性咽异感症患者病因分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2006,20(3):129-131. 被引量:17
  • 3VAEZI M F, HICKS D M, ABELSON T I, et al. Laryngeal signs and symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux disease:a critical assessment of cause and effect association [J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ,2003,1: 333-334.
  • 4KOUFMAN J, AVIV J, CASIANO R, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2002,127:32-35.
  • 5JOHNSTON N, BULMER D, GILL G A, et al. Cell biology of laryngeal epithelial defenses in health and disease:further studies[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryn gol, 2003, 112:481-491.
  • 6HICKSON C, SIMPSON C B, FALCON R. Laryngeal pseudosulcus as a predictor of laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Laryngoscope,2001,111:1742-1745.
  • 7VAEZI M F. Laryngitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease: increasing prevalence or poor diagnostic tests [J]? Am J Gastroenterol, 2004, 99:786-788.
  • 8BELAFSKY P C, POSTMA G N, KOUFMAN J A. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI) [J]. J Voice ,2002, 16:274-277.
  • 9HICKS D M, OURS T M, ABELSON T I, et al. The prevalence of hypopharynx findings associated with gastroesophageal reflux in normal volunteers [J]. J Voice, 2002, 16:564-579.
  • 10KAWAMURA O, ASLAM M, RITTMANN T, et al. Physical and pH properties of gastroesophagopharyngeal refluxate:a 24-hour simultaneous ambulatory impedance and pH monitoring study[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2004,99 : 1000-1010.

共引文献97

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部