期刊文献+

达芬奇机器人腹股沟疝十二例修补术 被引量:12

Leonardo Da Vinci robot 12 cases inguinal hernia repair
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨达芬奇机器人腹股沟疝修补术的可行性及近期疗效。方法 回顾性分析2014年1月至2015年5月,沈阳军区总医院利用达芬奇系统完成腹股沟疝修补术12例,其中达芬奇经腹路径9例,达芬奇完全腹膜外路径3例。结果 12例手术均顺利完成,手术无中转。平均手术时间(110.0±17.5)min。术中无明显失血。术后2~3 d出院。术后随访5~16个月,无复发患者。平均住院费用3.2万元。结论 利用达芬奇操作系统进行TEP及TAPP是可行的,手术时间及较高住院费用可能限制了其广泛应用。 Objective To investigate the feasibility and short term outcome of Da Vinci robotic-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 12 cases of inguinal hernia which underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia using the Da Vinci surgical system in the general hospital of Shenyang military region from January 2014 to May 2015. Of these, these were 9 operated via transabdominal approach and 3 via totally extraperitoneal approach. Results All the 12 cases were operated successfully, without conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was ( 110. 0 ± 17.5) rain, and there was no obvious blood loss. Patients were discharged in 2-3 days after operations. After the postoperative follow-up of 5 to 16 months, there was no recurrence. The average hospitalization costs was 32 000 yuan. Conclusion It is feasible using Da Vinci surgical system in TEP and TAPP. The long operative time and high hospital costs may be the reason limits its widely using.
出处 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》 2016年第5期326-328,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 机器人 疝修补术 腹腔镜 腹股沟 Robotics Repair of hernia Laparoscopy Hernia, inguinal
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Braumann C, Jacobi CA, Menenakos C, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and thoracoscnpie surgery with the da Vinci system: a 4- year experience in a single institution [ J ]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2008, 18(3) : 260-266.
  • 2Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et at. Systematic review and meta- analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [ J ]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62 ( 3 ) : 382-404.
  • 3Gob AC, Gill IS, Lee DJ, et al. Robotic intracorporeal urthotopic ileal neobladder: replicating open surgical principles[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(5) : 891-901.
  • 4Bracale U, Melillo P, Pignata G, et al. Which is the best laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernia repair: TEP or TAPP? A systematic review of the literature with a network meta- analysis [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(12) : 3355-3366.
  • 5Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Bartsch DK, et al. Transabdominal preperitoneal versus totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia : a meta-analysis of randomized studies [ J ]. Am J Surg, 2013, 206 (2) : 245-252. el.
  • 6Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Rieger R, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after transabdominal preperitoneal, total preperitoneal nr Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair[ J ]. Br J Surg, 1996, 83(11 ) : 1563-1566.
  • 7李健文,王明刚,唐健雄,郑民华.腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术规范化操作指南[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2013,7(5). 被引量:13
  • 8蒋会勇,马锐,郭一君,张雪峰.逆向穿刺法建立腹膜前间隙在腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术中的应用[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2015,20(6):455-457. 被引量:39
  • 9Son T, lee JH, Kim YM, et al. Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(9) : 2606-2615.
  • 10Hanly EJ, Talamini MA. Robotic abdominal surgery [ J ]. Am J Surg, 2004, 188(4A Suppl) : 19S-26S.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Nasr AO, Tormey S, Walsh TN. Lipoma of the cord and roundligament: an overlooked diagnosis.. Hernia, 2005 , 9(3) :245-247.
  • 2Alexandre JH, Bouillot JL, Dupin P, et al. Cure of inguinal herniaswith large preperitoneal prosthesis : Experience of 2, 312 cases. JMinim Access Surg,2006, 2(3) :134-138.
  • 3Mainik F, Quast G, Flade-Kuthe R, et al. The preperitoneal loop ininguinal hernia repair following the totally extraperitoneal technique.Hemia,2010,14(4) :361-367.
  • 4Reddy VM,Sutton CD,Bloxham L,et al. Laparoscopic repair of directinguinal hernia : a new technique that reduces the development ofpostoperative seroraa. Hernia, 2007,11(5) : 393-396.
  • 5Moreno-Egea A, Paredes PG, Perello JM,et al. Vascular injury bytacks during totally extraperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hemioplasty.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2010, 20(3) :129-131.
  • 6Paul JF,Virag R. Does anatomy of the pubic arch interfere with themaintaining of erection.. J Sex Med, 2013,10(3) :777-781.
  • 7Feng B,He ZR,Li JW,et al. Feasibility of Incremental LaparoscopicInguinal Hernia Repair Development in China : an 11-YearExperience, J Am Coll Surg, 2013,216(2) :258-265.
  • 8Sajid MS, Ladwa N,Kalra L, et al. A meta-analysis examining theuse of tacker fixation versus no-fixation of mesh in laparoscopicinguinal hernia repair. Int J Surg, 2012, 10(5) :224-231.
  • 9Fortelny RH,Petter-Puchner AH, Glaser KS, et al. Use of fibrinsealant ( Tisseel/Tissucol) in hernia repair : a systematic review.Surg Endosc,2012 , 26(7) :1803-1812.
  • 10Misra MC, Kumar S,Bansal VK, et al. Total extraperitoneal (TEP)mesh repair of inguinal hernia in the developing world : comparison oflow-cost indigenous balloon dissection versus direct telescopicdissection : a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc,2008’ 22(9) :19474958.

共引文献49

同被引文献97

引证文献12

二级引证文献98

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部