摘要
目的:探究脑动脉瘤临床治疗及其效果。方法:随机选取某院2013年-2015年收治入院的脑动脉瘤患者78例作为研究对象,按照治疗方法不同将其分成开颅组(予以常规开颅手术治疗)、介入组(予以血管内介入栓塞治疗)和内科组(予以常规药物治疗),各组分别有26例,对比各组临床疗效。结果:经过各自的治疗后,介入组临床治愈率明显高于其他两组,且内科组的死亡率明显高于其他两组,开颅组的致残率较其他两组高,差异经统计学分析存在显著性(P〈0.05)。结论:相较而言,脑动脉瘤患者实施介入治疗能有效提高临床疗效,值得推广应用。
Objective:To explore the clinical treatment effect of cerebral aneurysms.Methods:78cases of hospitalized patients with cerebral aneurysms in a hospital from 2013 to 2015were selected randomly as research subjects,and divided into craniotomy group(given conventional craniotomy),the intervention group(given endovascular embolization therapy)and internal medicine group(given routine medicine therapy)according to the different treatment methods,and 26 patients in each group.Then compared the clinical efficacy of each group.Results:After each treatment,the clinical cure rate of intervention group was significantly higher than that of other two groups,and the mortality rate of internal medicine group was significantly higher than that of other two groups,and disability rate of craniotomy group was higher than that of other two groups.The difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05).Conclusion:In contrast,patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with intervention therapy can effectively improve the clinical efficacy,which is worthy of promotion and application.
出处
《数理医药学杂志》
2016年第10期1489-1490,共2页
Journal of Mathematical Medicine
关键词
脑动脉瘤
血管内介入栓塞治疗
疗效分析
cerebral aneurysm
endovascular embolization
efficacy analysis