期刊文献+

全面风险管理的理论基础:以主体为出发点 被引量:4

The Theoretical Basis of Enterprise Risk Management:Enterprise as the Starting Point
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于"风险"新定义,风险管理应该是对"外因通过内因起作用,形成综合效应"这一动态过程的管理,三个要素缺一不可,尤其是对风险导因的管控,这才是风险管理的抓手。而且,将决策主体看作由不同个体组成的集体或系统,是全面风险管理区别于一般风险管理的关键所在。在风险与不确定性决策理论框架下,本文试图为全面风险管理建立一套以"主体E"为出发点的规范性理论基础,从明确界定决策主体E开始,设定其理性行为假设,研究应该如何基于对外部不确定性的认知与衡量,并结合对决策后果的价值判断,选择最优策略。 Based on the new definition of risk, risk management should be designed to manage the dynamic interac- tion of external cause activating the internal cause, which is the origin of combined effects. The three factors are in- dispensable of each other. In particular, the control of risk engendering factor is the basis for risk management. Moreover, a fundamental difference exists between risk management and enterprise risk management. For the latter, the principal ' Enterprise' is a group or system that is composed of different individual bodies. Under the framework of risk and uncertainty decision-making theory, this paper attempts to construct a normative theoreti- cal basis for enterprise risk management,which views 'Enterprise' as the starting point. Starting from defining the decision-maker 'Enterprise' and setting her behavioral assumptions, this paper analyzes how the decision maker choose reasonable risk management strategies on the basis of its perception and evaluation of external uncertainties and its judgment on the effects of its decisions.
作者 崔亚
出处 《保险研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期28-40,共13页 Insurance Studies
关键词 全面风险管理 风险与不确定性决策理论 群体决策 enterprise effects of its decisions risk management risk and uncertainty decision-making theory group decision
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1李红梅.中国商业银行整体风险管理研究[D].沈阳:辽宁大学,2010.
  • 2钱颖一.理解现代经济学[J].经济社会体制比较,2002(2):1-12. 被引量:291
  • 3谢志刚,周晶.重新认识风险这个概念[J].保险研究,2013(2):101-108. 被引量:28
  • 4郑权,谢志刚.关于决策论的基础[J].自然杂志,1989,12(3):205-209. 被引量:2
  • 5Casualty Actuarial Society. Overview of Enterprise Risk Management[ R ]. 2003.
  • 6COSO. Enterprise Risk Management-Integrated Framework [ Z ]. 2004.
  • 7Fishburn,P. C. Independence in Utility Theory with Whole Product Sets [ J]. Operational Research, 1965,13 (1) :28 -45.
  • 8Fishburn,P. C. Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory [ M]. John Hopkins University Press, 1988.
  • 9Keeney, R. L. Foundations for Group Decision Analysis [ J ]. Decision Analysis,2013,10 (2) : 1 - 18.
  • 10Moscati,I. How Economists Came to Accept Expected Utility Theory:The Case of Samuelson and Savage[ J ]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2016,20 (2) : 219 - 236.

二级参考文献41

  • 1Akerlof, George. "The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism." Quarterly Journal of Economics. 84(3), pp. 488-500, August 1970.
  • 2Akerlof, George. "Procrastination and Obedience." American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings. Richard T. Ely Lecture. 81(1), pp.1-19, May 1991.
  • 3Arrow, Kenneth, and Frank Hahn. General Competitive Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1971.
  • 4Black, Duncan. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
  • 5Cheung, Steven N.S. The Theory of Share Tenancy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
  • 6Coase, Ronald. "The Problem of Social Cost." Journal of Law and Economics, 3, pp. 1-44, October, 1960.
  • 7Debreu, Gerald. Theory of Value. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972.
  • 8Diamond, Douglas, and Philip Dybvig. "Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity." Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), pp. 401-419, June 1983.
  • 9Fama, Eugene. "Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm." Journal of Political Economy,88(2), pp. 288-307, April 1980.
  • 10Grossman, Gene, and Elhanan Helpman. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 2001.

共引文献318

同被引文献44

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部