期刊文献+

经阴道超声诊断剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室的临床价值 被引量:8

Clinical value of transvaginal ultrasound in diagnosis of cesarean scar diverticulum after cesarean section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经阴道超声检查对剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室的诊断价值。方法对剖宫产术后临床怀疑切口处憩室的50例患者行经阴道超声检查,检查过程中观察切口处有无憩室,测量憩室大小及其最薄肌层厚度,检查后1个月内均进行宫腔镜检查,以宫腔镜检查发现憩室作为诊断标准。结果宫腔镜发现憩室45例,经阴道超声检查发现憩室40例,与宫腔镜相比,经阴道超声检查诊断憩室的符合率为90.00%,灵敏度为88.89%,特异度为100.00%,漏诊率为11.11%。经阴道超声检查测量憩室大小为上下径(9.17±2.63)mm、左右径(11.76±5.67)mm、高度(5.62±2.13)mm,最薄肌层厚度(3.29±1.01)mm。结论经阴道超声检查能够较好的发现子宫切口处憩室并能够对憩室大小、肌层厚度进行准确测量,是一种诊断切口处憩室无创、便捷的检查方法。 Objective To investigate diagnostic value of transvaginal ultrasound for cesarean scar diverticulum after cesarean section. Methods Transvaginal ultrasound was taken by 50 patients with suspected scar diverticulum after cesarean section. Scar diverticulum was observed, and diverticulum size and the thinnest muscular thickness were detected. All patients received hysteroscope examination after 1 month, and hysteroscopic outcome was taken as diagnosis standard. Results There were 45 cases with diverticulum detected by hysteroscope and 40 cases by transvaginal ultrasound. Comparing with hysteroscope, transvaginal ultrasound in diagnosing diverticulum showed coincidence rate as 90.00%, sensitivity as 88.89%, specificity as 100.00% and misdiagnosis rate as 11.11%. Transvaginal ultrasound showed vertical diameter of diverticulum as(9.17±2.63) mm, transversal diameter as(11.76±5.67) mm, height as(5.62±2.13) mm and the thinnest muscular thickness as(3.29±1.01) mm. Conclusion As an non-invasive and convenient examination way in diagnosis of scar diverticulum, transvaginal ultrasound can detect cesarean scar diverticulum and measure diverticulum size and muscular thickness with good accuracy.
出处 《中国实用医药》 2016年第26期21-22,共2页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 经阴道超声检查 剖宫产瘢痕憩室 宫腔镜 Transvaginal ultrasound Cesarean scar diverticulum Hysteroscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Melinamath BC, Math AG, Biradar SD. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse shorl-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. Bmc Medicine, 201 O, 8(18):71.
  • 2Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 34(1):90-97.
  • 3Tower AM, Frishman GN. Cesarean scar defects: an underreeognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2013, 20(5):562-572.
  • 4Simpson LL. When is primary cesaan appropriate: fetal indications. Semin Perinatol, 2012, 36(5):328-335.
  • 5吴钟瑜,李慧东,张蕾.剖宫产术后子宫切口瘢痕处憩室的阴道超声诊断[J].中华妇产科杂志,2008,43(6):452-453. 被引量:48
  • 6Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement. Uhrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 35(I):75-83.
  • 7Valentin L. Prediction of scar integrity and vaginal birth after caesarean delivery. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2013, 27(2):285-295.

二级参考文献4

  • 1艾梅.子宫憩室妊娠反复漏吸1例[J].医学理论与实践,2005,18(1):61-62. 被引量:10
  • 2李萍,陶敏芳.子宫峡部憩室1例[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(1):43-43. 被引量:8
  • 3Van Horenbeeck A, Temmerman M, Dhont M. Cesarean scar dehiscence and irregular uterine bleeding, Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 102:1137-1139.
  • 4Fabres C, Aviles G, De La Jara C, et al. The cesarean delivery scar pouch: clinical implications and diagnostic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy. J Ultrasound Med, 2003,22:695-700.

共引文献47

同被引文献59

引证文献8

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部