期刊文献+

互联网学术信息可信性评价行为研究综述 被引量:3

Overview on Internet Academic Information Credibility Evaluation Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 许多研究经验表明互联网学术信息对用户来说具有高效、快捷、易用、成本低等特点,已然成为大学生获取文献资料和相关研究信息的主要途径,但由于相应评审机制的缺乏使得这些学术信息的质量难以控制,参差不齐,对网上学术信息资源的不当利用会造成的不良影响颇多。通过对国内外互联网学术信息可信性评价判据及评价行为研究现状的文献梳理和回顾,对大学生互联网学术信息可信性从评价判据和评价行为方面做了具体的分析研究,并提出下一步的研究重点和方向。 A plenty of experience indicates that the Internet academic information , being efficient, fast, easy-to-use and low-cost for users, now becomes the principal way for university students to acquire literature and research materials. However, the lacking of relevant accreditation mechanism would usually result in the hard control of academic information quality, and improper use of uncred- ible academic information resources on the Internet would also endanger the core values of academic research and academic writing . Through literature review and coming-up of the developing course of Internet information credibility and the research status both at home and abroad, a concrete analysis on college students' Internet academic information credibility evaluation is done from the aspects of evaluation criterion and evaluation behavior. In addition, the focal points and direction for next-step research are suggested in this paper.
作者 张向宇
出处 《信息安全与通信保密》 2016年第9期63-66,共4页 Information Security and Communications Privacy
关键词 互联网 学术信息 信息可信性 评价行为 the Internet academic information information credibility evaluation behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Fogg B J, Hsiang Tseng. The Elements of Computer Credibility [J]. Pittsburgh PA, 1999(5) : 80-87.
  • 2Web Quality 2011.Joint WICOW/AIR Web Workshop on Web Quality ( Web Quality 2011 ) [ EB/OL]. ( 2011 - 07 - 07 ) [2016-08-07]. https://www, researchgate, net/publication/ 221023886_Joint_WICOWAIRWeb_workshop_on_web_quality _WebQuality_2011.
  • 3胡磊.互联网学术信息质量启发式评价中存在的问题分析[J].情报科学,2011,29(2):178-181. 被引量:6
  • 4Deborah J Grimes , Carl H Boening, Worries with the Web: A Look at Student Use of Web Resources[ J ]. College & Librar- ies Research . 2001.
  • 5West M D. Validating A Scale for the Measurement of Credibil- ity : A Covariance Structure Modeling Approach [ J ]. Journal- ism Quarterly, 1994(71 ) : 159-65.
  • 6张明新.五十年媒介可信度研究述评[J].湖北大学成人教育学院学报,2005,23(5):8-11. 被引量:9
  • 7Gunther A C. Biased Press or Biased Public Attitudes Toward Media Coverage of Social Groups [J]. Public Opinion Quar- terly, 1992(2): 147-167.
  • 8黄晓斌,朱滔,刘子明.中美大学生对网上学术信息的可信性认识的调查与比较[J].图书情报知识,2006,23(1):89-93. 被引量:9
  • 9胡磊.互联网学术信息可信性评价判据研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2012,48(5):712-718. 被引量:14
  • 10Rieh S Y, Belkin N I. Interaction on the Web: Scholars' Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority [ C]// Proceedings of the 63rd ASIS Annual Meeting. Chica- go, 2000(37): 25-38.

二级参考文献73

共引文献38

同被引文献12

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部