期刊文献+

桂科Ⅰ号成年公猪体细胞核移植胚胎的体外生产

In vitro Production of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfered Embryos Derived from Adult Boar of Guike No.1
原文传递
导出
摘要 目前,关于桂科Ⅰ号猪体细胞核移植胚胎体外发育的研究尚未见报道。本研究结果表明,桂科Ⅰ号成年公猪来源的皮肤成纤维细胞(adult boar fibroblast cell,ABFC)和刚出生小公猪来源的皮肤成纤维细胞(newborn boar fibroblast cell,NBFC)对体细胞核移植(somatic cell nuclear transfer,SCNT)胚胎的体外发育没有明显影响;在体外环境培养下,一种组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂—Scriptaid(SCR)对桂科Ⅰ号公猪SCNT胚胎的囊胚率具有促进作用。研究进行3个实验,实验一结果表明,细胞呈现典型的成纤维细胞形态,且生长呈现S型;实验二结果表明,通过将ABFC与NBFC注射到去核的卵母细胞制作SCNT胚胎,ABFC和NBFC来源的桂科Ⅰ号公猪SCNT胚胎的融合率、分裂率、囊胚率和囊胚细胞数没有明显的差异(53.2%vs 61.7%,p>0.05;72.3%vs 75.7%,p>0.05;11.9%vs 11.7%,p>0.05;60.7 vs 57.5,p>0.05);实验三结果表明,通过500 nmol/L SCR处理ABFC来源的SCNT胚胎,与对照组相比,处理组的分裂率和囊胚细胞数没有明显的差异(82.6%vs 80.1%,p>0.05;42.9 vs 41.4,p>0.05);但添加500 nmol/L SCR的ABFC来源的SCNT胚胎的囊胚率明显比对照组的高(21.6%vs 11.5%,p<0.05)。数据表明桂科Ⅰ号成年公猪体细胞可作为供体细胞生产克隆胚胎,并且在体外环境培养下,通过500 nmol/L SCR处理极大地提高克隆胚胎的囊胚率,本研究可为下一步生产存活的桂科Ⅰ号SCNT猪奠定基础。 So far, there were no reports regarding the study about somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos derived from Guike No. 1 in vitro. In this study, there was no significant difference on in vitro development of SCNT embryos derived from adult boar fibroblast cell (ABFC) compared to newborn boar fibroblast cell (NBFC) of Guike No. 1. A histone deacetylase inhibitor-scriptaid (SCR) have a positive impact on blastocyst rate of SCNT in vitro embryos derived from Guike No. 1. Three experiments were performed with routine production of cloned embryos derived from ABFC and NBFC of Guike No. 1. Results showed that: in experiment 1 : assessment of cell style showed that ABFC and NBFC are very pure fibroblasts, and cell growth curves showed a typical "S" shape; in experiment 2: we made SCNT embryos via injecting ABFC and NBFC into denucleated oocytes, there was no significant difference in fusion rate, cleavage rate, blastocyst rate and blastocyst cells number (53.2% vs 61.7%, p 〉0.05; 72.3% vs 75.7%, p 〉0.05; 11.9% vs 11.7%, p 〉0.05; 60.7 vs 57.5, p 〉0.05); in experiment 3: treating embryos derived from ABFC with 500 nmol/L SCR, compared with control group, no significant difference was observed in cleavage rate and blastocyst cells number (82.6% vs 80.1%, p〉0.05; 42.9 vs 41.4, p〉0.05), but treat- ment with 500 nmol/L SCR in blastocyst rate is more higher than the control group (21.6% vs l 1.5%, p〈0.05). The data suggested that cells derived from ABFC of Guike No. 1 can make as donor cells for cloned embryos, and extremely improved blastocyst rate of cloned embryos in vitro was observed by treatment with 500 nmol/L SCR. This study laid the foundation for next step that produce alive SCNT pig of Guike No. 1.
作者 聂骏宇 农素群 朱向星 谢炳坤 全守能 王雪芳 肖鹏 许惠艳 杨小淦 陆阳清 张明 卢克焕 廖玉英 卢晟盛 Nie Junyu Nong Suqun Zhu Xiangxing Xie Bingkun Quan Shouneng Wang Xuefang Xiao Peng Xu Huiyan Yang Xiaogan Lu Yangqing Zhang Ming Lu Kehuan Liao Yuying Lu Shengsheng(Guangxi Key Laboratory of Livestock Genetic Improvement, Guangxi Institute of Animal Sciences, Nanning, 530001 State Key Laboratory for Con- servation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources/College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi Universitv. Nanninm 530004)
出处 《基因组学与应用生物学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期2329-2335,共7页 Genomics and Applied Biology
基金 广西家畜遗传改良重点实验室开放课题(2014GXKLLGI-08)资助
关键词 桂科Ⅰ号 体细胞核移植 胚胎 组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂 Guike 1, SCNT, Embryo, Histone deacetylase inhibitor
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献94

  • 1潘登科,张运海,孙秀柱,张健,李旭阳,李燕,顾志良,戴蕴平,吴常信,李宁.低氧培养早期胚胎克隆小型猪(Sus Scrofa)[J].科学通报,2006,51(4):415-419. 被引量:23
  • 2商海涛,魏泓.我国小型猪品系资源状况初浅分析[J].中国实验动物学报,2007,15(1):70-75. 被引量:38
  • 3Aigner B., R enner S., Kessler B., Klymiuk N., Kurome M., Wunsch A., and Wolf E., 2010, Transgenic pigs as models for translational biomedical research, Journal of Molecular Medicine, 88(7): 653-664.
  • 4Capecchi M.R., 1980, High efficiency transformation by direct microinjection of DNA into cultured mammalian cells, Cell, 22(Pt 2): 479-488.
  • 5Chailertvanitkul V.N., and Pouton C.W., 2010, Adenovirus: A blueprint for non-viral gene delivery, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 21(5): 627-632.
  • 6Dalby B., Cates S., Harris A., Ohki E.C., Tilkins M.L., Price P.J., and Ciccaronec V.C., 2004, Advanced transfection with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent: Primary neurons, siRNA, and high-throughput applications, Methods, 33(2): 95-103.
  • 7Escriou V., Ciolina C., Helbling-Leclerc A., Wils P., and Scher- man D., 1998, Cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer: Analy- sis of cellular uptake and nuclear import of plasmid DNA, Cell Biology and Toxicology, 14(2): 95-104.
  • 8Farhood H., Bottega R., Epand R.M., and Huang L., 1992, Effect of cationic cholesterol derivatives on gene transfer and pro- tein kinase C activity, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1111 (2): 239-246.
  • 9Gao X., and Huang L., 1991, A novel cationic liposome reagent for efficient transfection of mammalian cells, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 179(1): 280-285.
  • 10Guo H.C., Hao R.Z., Wei Y.Q., Sun D.H., Sun S.Q., and Zhang Z.C., 2012, Optimization of electrotransfection conditions of mammalian cells with different biological features, J. Mem- brane. Biol., 245(12): 789-795.

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部