期刊文献+

基于可信任第三方的网上诚信交易机制设计 被引量:5

Online Trust Transactions through an Incentive Mechanism based on Trusted Third Party
下载PDF
导出
摘要 面对网上交易过程中存在的买卖双方双边囚徒困境问题,设计了带有集体声誉的可信任第三方主体机制(CR&TTP),采用注册费用和惩罚欺诈等形式能够实现网上诚信交易。通过构建不完全信息动态博弈模型和重复博弈模型,研究表明:在短期交易中,诚实交易者会在第1阶段选择注册CR&TTP,买卖双方在第2阶段都会选择诚实交易,并给出了机会主义交易方在第1阶段参与注册CR&TTP的纳什均衡条件;在长期交易中,当支付罚金和欺诈损失率满足一定条件时,交易双方的子博弈完美纳什均衡是双方都选择注册CR&TTP并诚信交易;通过数值分析还显示,第三方平台的惩罚因子和交易提成设置越大都会降低欺诈交易方支付CR&TTP罚金的可能性。 Considering the buyer and seller's bilateral prisoner dilemma in online transactions,this paper proposes a mechanism "Collective Reputation and Trusted Third Party(CRTTP)"to achieve the credible trading in online transactions by means of registration fees and cheating punishment.Using the incomplete information dynamic game model and the repeated game model,this study shows that in the short-term trading process,honest traders would choose to register for CRTTP in the first stage of the game,and both the buyers and sellers would choose to trade honestly in the second stage of the game.Moreover,Nash equilibrium condition for opportunistic traders to register for CRTTP in the first stage is also calculated.On the other hand,in the long-term trading,the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium for both the buyers and sellers is to choose to register for CRTTP and trade honestly when penalty and fraud losses meet certain conditions.Numerical analysis shows that the higher penalty and trading commission of the third party would both reduce the probability for fraudulent trading parties to pay the penalty of CRTTP.
出处 《系统管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期821-828,共8页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371111 71471105) 教育部人文社科项目(14YJA630007) 山东省社科规划项目(13CGLZ03)
关键词 网上交易 动态博弈 第三方平台 机制设计 online transactions dynamics game model trusted third party mechanism design
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1井淼,周颖,王方华.网上购物感知风险的实证研究[J].系统管理学报,2007,16(2):164-169. 被引量:40
  • 2吴德胜,任星耀.网上拍卖交易机制有效性研究——来自淘宝网面板数据的证据[J].南开管理评论,2013,16(1):122-137. 被引量:25
  • 3Ba S, Pavtou P A. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior[J].MIS Quarterly, 2002, 26(3): 243-268.
  • 4Dellarocas C. Goodwill hunting: An economically efficient online feedback mechanism for environments with variable product quality [C] // International Workshop on Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce,Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002: 238-252.
  • 5丁黎黎,姜亚楠,王垒.边缘路线信息丰裕度对消费者在线购买决策的影响[J].财经论丛,2014(9):68-74. 被引量:11
  • 6Wood C, Dellarocas C. The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the reporting bias[J].Management Science, 2008, 54 (3): 460- 476.
  • 7Li L F. Reputation, trust, and rebates: How online auction markets can improve their feedback mechanisms[J]. Journal of Economics Management Strategy, 2010, 19(2) :303-331.
  • 8Zhao H, Yang X, Li X. An incentive mechanism to reinforce truthful reports in reputation systems [J].Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2012, 35(3):951-961.
  • 9Ghaffarinejad A, Akhari M K. An incentive compatible and distributed reputation mechanism based on context similarity for service oriented systems[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2013, 29(3) :863-875.
  • 10Ba S. Establishing online trust through a community responsibility system[J].Decision Support Systems, 2001, 31(3): 323-336.

二级参考文献62

共引文献134

同被引文献60

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部