期刊文献+

还原、整合与生物学统一策略 被引量:2

Reduction,Integration,and New Strategy for Biological Unification
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学统一问题一直是科学哲学的一个争论焦点。否定科学统一的哲学运动并没有改变生物学家追求生物学统一的努力。沙夫那的研究表明理论还原在生物学研究实践中仍然具有重要的启发作用,而达尔丹等人有关科学整合的研究也表明非还原统一策略的普遍性。各种统一策略对生物学实践的启发作用是生物学史的事实,而追求科学的非统一性并不是生物学实践的主要途径。 The problem on scientific unification has long been an issue focus in the philosophy of science. The philo- sophical movement of denying scientific unification has not changed biologists" effort to adhere biological unification. Schaffner's researches show that theoretical reduction plays an important evocative role in biological practice. Darden and others have indicated that there are some unified strategies without reduction. It is a fact in biological history that a variety of unified strategies has been promoting biological developments, but the ideal about disunity of science is not the main way of biological practice.
作者 董国安 DONG Guo - an(School of Philosophy, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China)
出处 《长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第5期5-15,共11页 Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Social Science
基金 国家社科基金重大项目资助(14ZDB171)
关键词 科学统一 整合 还原 科学非统一性 scientific unification integration reduction scientific dis--unification
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Oppenheim P and Putnam H. Unity of Science as aWorking Hypothesis[J]. In Feigl H, Seriven M Maxwell G eds. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Seience Vol II, Minneapolis.. University of Minnesota Press, 1958.
  • 2Schaffner K. Approaches to Reduction[J]. Philosophy of Science, 1967(34) : 137-- 147.
  • 3Hull D. Philosophy of Biological Science[M]. Engle- wood Cliffs, N J .. Prentice--Hall,1974:39.
  • 4Rosenberg A. The Structure of Biological Science[M]. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 1985 .. 97.
  • 5Kitcher P. 1953 and All That: A Tale of Two Sciences [J]. The Philosophical Review 1984,93(3) : 335-- 373.
  • 6金在权,郁锋(译).50年之后的心-身问题[J].世界哲学,2007(1):40-52. 被引量:12
  • 7Fodor J. Special sciences, or the disunity of science as a working hypothesis[J]. Synthese , 1974 (28) : 77 - 115.
  • 8段伟文.科技哲学的进路重整与时代观照[J].哲学动态,2014(5):14-25. 被引量:11
  • 9Schaffner K. Theory Structure, Reduction, and Disci- plinary Integration in Biology[J]. Biology and Philoso- phy,1993(8) : 319--347.
  • 10Schaffner K. Reduction: the Cheshire Cat Problem and a Return to Roots[J]. Synthese, 2006 (151): 377 --402.

二级参考文献21

  • 1吴彤.走向实践优位的科学哲学——科学实践哲学发展述评[J].哲学研究,2005(5):86-93. 被引量:43
  • 2竹尾治一郎编著.《科学哲学》,桂起权、王建新译,上海译文出版社,1994,第1-2页.
  • 3J. Fodor, "Special Sciences: Or, the Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis", Synthese, 28, 1974, pp. 97 - 115.
  • 4Steve Fuller, "The Art of Being Human : A Project for General Philosophy of Science", Journal for General Philosophy of Science, July 2012, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp. 113 - 123.
  • 5Hans-rg rheinberger, On historicizing epistemology : An Essay, translated by David Fernbach, Stanford University Press, 2010, p. 1.
  • 6Ronald N. Giere, Scientific Prespectivism, The University of Chicago Press, 2006, pp. 1 - 15.
  • 7Peter Galison and David J. Stump, eds. , The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Context, and Power, Stanford University Press, 1996, pp. 101 - 117.
  • 8S. D. Mitchell, Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity and Policy, University of Chicago Press, 2009, pp. 12 - 13.
  • 9Stephen H. Kellert, Helen E. Longino, C. Kenneth Waters, eds. , Scientific Pluralism, University of Minnesota Press, 2006, pp. vii - xxvii.
  • 10Karl Leidlmair, ed. , After Cognitivism : A Reassessment of Cognitive Science and Philosophy, Springer, 2009, p. 3.

共引文献21

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部